Health Research Board (HRB) Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland (SCTNI), Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Ireland.
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):704-713. doi: 10.1177/23969873241246489. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
Inflammation is an emerging target for secondary prevention after stroke and randomised trials of anti-inflammatory therapies are ongoing. Fibrinogen, a putative pro-inflammatory marker, is associated with first stroke, but its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after stroke is unclear.
We did a systematic review investigating the association between fibrinogen and post-stroke vascular recurrence. Authors were invited to provide individual-participant data (IPD) and where available we did within-study multivariable analyses with adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and medications. Adjusted summary-level data was extracted from published reports from studies that did not provide IPD. We pooled risk ratios (RR) by random-effects meta-analysis by comparing supra-median with sub-median fibrinogen levels and performed pre-specified subgroup analysis according to timing of phlebotomy after the index event.
Eleven studies were included (14,002 patients, 42,800 follow-up years), of which seven provided IPD. Fibrinogen was associated with recurrent MACE on unadjusted (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.17-1.57, supra-median vs sub-median) and adjusted models (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38). Fibrinogen was associated with recurrent stroke on univariate analysis (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.39), but not after adjustment (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.94-1.31). The association with recurrent MACE was consistently observed in patients with post-acute (⩾14 days) fibrinogen measures (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.45), but not in those with early phlebotomy (<14 days) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.18) ( = 0.01). Similar associations were observed for recurrent stroke.
Fibrinogen was independently associated with recurrence after stroke, but the association was modified by timing of phlebotomy. Fibrinogen measurements might be useful to identify patients who are more likely to derive benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies after stroke.
炎症是中风二级预防的一个新兴靶点,目前正在进行抗炎症治疗的随机试验。纤维蛋白原,一种潜在的促炎标志物,与首次中风有关,但它与中风后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项系统评价,研究纤维蛋白原与中风后血管再发之间的关系。我们邀请作者提供个体参与者数据(IPD),并在可用的情况下,我们对有心血管危险因素和药物调整的研究进行了研究内多变量分析。从未提供 IPD 的研究的已发表报告中提取调整后汇总水平数据。我们通过比较超中位数与中位数纤维蛋白原水平,采用随机效应荟萃分析对风险比(RR)进行汇总,并根据索引事件后采血的时间进行了预先指定的亚组分析。
共纳入 11 项研究(14002 例患者,42800 例随访年),其中 7 项研究提供了 IPD。未调整模型(RR 1.35,95%CI 1.17-1.57,超中位数比中位数)和调整模型(RR 1.21,95%CI 1.06-1.38)下,纤维蛋白原与 MACE 再发相关。纤维蛋白原与单变量分析中的中风再发相关(RR 1.19,95%CI 1.03-1.39),但调整后无相关性(RR 1.11,95%CI 0.94-1.31)。在急性后期(≥14 天)纤维蛋白原测量的患者中,这种与 MACE 再发的关联是一致的(RR 1.29,95%CI 1.16-1.45),但在早期采血(<14 天)的患者中(RR 0.98,95%CI 0.82-1.18)( = 0.01)。在中风再发中也观察到类似的关联。
纤维蛋白原与中风后复发独立相关,但采血时间的不同改变了这种相关性。纤维蛋白原检测可能有助于识别那些更有可能从中风后抗炎治疗中获益的患者。