Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, School of Management and Law, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur 8401, Switzerland.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil 4123, Switzerland.
Age Ageing. 2024 Apr 1;53(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae069.
Most longitudinal studies found heightened feelings of loneliness in older people in spring 2020 compared to times before the pandemic. However, longer-term effects are more disputed. We, therefore, investigated changes in loneliness in older people throughout the first 21 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland and examined the association between the stringency of COVID-19 measures and feelings of loneliness.
We assessed loneliness (3-item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale) in a nationally representative longitudinal observational online survey. Older people (65-79 years) were surveyed between March 2020 and December 2021. Proportions of people feeling lonely (UCLA loneliness scale >6) were compared in two stringent phases ('lockdown', Oxford University stringency index ≥55) and two less restricted phases. Additionally, we explored the situation of potentially more susceptible subgroups (living alone, women, chronic and mental diseases, low educational level and low income).
Phases with stringent measures were associated with higher levels of loneliness in older people. People living alone, women, people with noncommunicable or mental disease diagnoses and lower income show consistently higher levels of loneliness. However, the differences are not accentuated in phases with more stringent measures. We found little differences between subgroups with varying educational levels.
Even in a country with relatively less stringent COVID-19 measures like Switzerland, an increase in the proportion of older people that feel lonely could be found during phases with more stringent COVID-19 measures. Lockdown phases should, therefore, be accompanied by evidence-based interventions to relieve loneliness to avoid adverse short- and long-term consequences.
大多数纵向研究发现,与大流行前相比,2020 年春季老年人的孤独感加剧。然而,长期影响存在更多争议。因此,我们调查了 COVID-19 大流行期间瑞士老年人孤独感的变化,并研究了 COVID-19 措施的严格程度与孤独感之间的关系。
我们使用全国代表性的纵向观察性在线调查评估了孤独感(加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)孤独量表的 3 项)。在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月期间对 65-79 岁的老年人进行了调查。在两个严格阶段(封锁阶段,牛津大学严格指数≥55)和两个限制较少的阶段,比较了感到孤独的人数比例(UCLA 孤独量表>6)。此外,我们还探讨了潜在易感亚组(独居、女性、慢性和精神疾病、低教育水平和低收入)的情况。
严格措施阶段与老年人孤独感水平升高有关。独居、女性、患有非传染性或精神疾病诊断以及收入较低的人始终表现出更高水平的孤独感。然而,在更严格措施的阶段,这些差异并没有加剧。我们发现不同教育水平的亚组之间差异不大。
即使在像瑞士这样 COVID-19 措施相对较宽松的国家,在更严格的 COVID-19 措施阶段,感到孤独的老年人比例也会增加。因此,封锁阶段应伴随基于证据的干预措施来缓解孤独感,以避免短期和长期的不良后果。