Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3615. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073615.
Lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic increase the risk of social isolation and loneliness, which may affect mental wellbeing. Therefore, we aimed to investigate associations between social isolation and loneliness with depressive symptoms in the German old-age population during the first COVID-19 lockdown. A representative sample of randomly selected individuals at least 65 years old ( = 1005) participated in a computer-assisted standardized telephone interview in April 2020. Sociodemographic data, aspects of the personal life situation, attitudes towards COVID-19 and standardized screening measures on loneliness (UCLA 3-item loneliness scale), depression (Brief Symptom Inventory/BSI-18), and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale/BRS) were assessed. Associations were inspected using multivariate regression models. Being lonely, but not isolated (β = 0.276; < 0.001) and being both isolated and lonely (β = 0.136; < 0.001) were associated with higher depressive symptoms. Being isolated, but not lonely was not associated with depressive symptoms. Thus, the subjective emotional evaluation, i.e., feeling lonely, of the social situation during lockdown seems more relevant than the objective state, i.e., being isolated. Normal (β = -0.203; < 0.001) and high resilience (β = -0.308; < 0.001) were associated with lower depressive symptoms across groups. Therefore, strengthening coping skills may be a support strategy during lockdowns, especially for lonely older individuals.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的封锁措施增加了社会隔离和孤独感的风险,这可能会影响心理健康。因此,我们旨在调查德国老年人群在首次 COVID-19 封锁期间社会隔离和孤独感与抑郁症状之间的关联。在 2020 年 4 月,采用计算机辅助的标准化电话访谈方式,对至少 65 岁的随机选择个体(=1005)进行了代表性样本调查。评估了社会人口统计学数据、个人生活状况方面、对 COVID-19 的态度以及孤独感(UCLA 3 项孤独量表)、抑郁(Brief Symptom Inventory/BSI-18)和韧性(Brief Resilience Scale/BRS)的标准化筛查措施。使用多变量回归模型检查关联。孤独但不隔离(β=0.276;<0.001)和既孤独又隔离(β=0.136;<0.001)与更高的抑郁症状相关。隔离但不孤独与抑郁症状无关。因此,封锁期间社会状况的主观情感评估,即感到孤独,似乎比客观状态,即隔离,更相关。正常(β=-0.203;<0.001)和高韧性(β=-0.308;<0.001)与各组的抑郁症状呈负相关。因此,在封锁期间,增强应对技能可能是一种支持策略,特别是对孤独的老年个体。