Suppr超能文献

损伤机制会影响下颌骨骨折的部位吗?一项系统评价。

Can the Mechanism of Injury Impact the Location of a Mandibular Fracture? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Hesham Abdulrahman, Geiger Joseph, Alshamrani Yousef, Sawatari Yoh

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Miami and Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL USA.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Apr;23(2):363-370. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01750-1. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Mandible fractures are the second most common fractures of the facial skeleton because of the prominent position of the lower jaw. The purpose of this study was to calculate the prevalence of mandibular fractures based on their causes and locations.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A systematic search of 3 electronic databases from January 2010 and January 2020 was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 359 articles identified for screening against selection criteria. The search identified 39 articles to be included in our analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 20,135 patients with 31,468 mandible fractures in this review. There was a 76% male predominance. The third decade was the most common age group (21-30). Motor vehicle accidents (39.89%) were the leading cause of mandible fractures, followed by falls (27.72%) and violence (25.35%). Condylar fractures are the most common cause of MVA and fall (33.11%, 50% respectively). Mandible body fractures are the second most common type of MVA injury (17.06%). When it came to violence, the angle of the mandible was the most common site (31.73%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of mandible fractures was higher in male patients in the current study, particularly in the second and third decades of life. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause, and the condylar process of the mandible was the most frequently affected region. Demographic data such as age, gender, and mechanism of injury can help surgeons predict and identify specific areas of mandibular fracture.

摘要

目的

由于下颌骨位置突出,下颌骨骨折是面部骨骼中第二常见的骨折。本研究的目的是根据下颌骨骨折的病因和部位计算其患病率。

材料与方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对2010年1月至2020年1月的3个电子数据库进行了系统检索。共识别出359篇文章,根据纳入标准进行筛选。检索确定了39篇文章纳入我们的分析。

结果

本综述共纳入20135例患者,发生31468例下颌骨骨折。男性占主导地位,占76%。第三个十年是最常见的年龄组(21 - 30岁)。机动车事故(39.89%)是下颌骨骨折的主要原因,其次是跌倒(27.72%)和暴力(25.35%)。髁突骨折是机动车事故和跌倒导致骨折的最常见原因(分别为33.11%和50%)。下颌骨体部骨折是机动车事故损伤的第二常见类型(17.06%)。在暴力导致的骨折中,下颌骨角是最常见的部位(31.73%)。

结论

在本研究中,男性患者下颌骨骨折的患病率较高,尤其是在第二个和第三个十年。道路交通事故是最常见的原因,下颌骨髁突是最常受影响的区域。年龄、性别和损伤机制等人口统计学数据有助于外科医生预测和识别下颌骨骨折的特定区域。

相似文献

2
Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.下颌骨骨折的回顾性临床研究
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Feb;40(1):21-6. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.1.21. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
4
Mandibular Fracture Patterns in a Rural Setup: A 7-Year Retrospective Study.农村地区下颌骨骨折模式:一项7年的回顾性研究。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Dec;21(4):1349-1354. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01358-3. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Prevalence of mandibular fractures.下颌骨骨折的患病率。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Nov-Dec;31(6):971-974. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_286_18.

本文引用的文献

2
The Patterns and Etiology of Maxillofacial Trauma in South India.印度南部颌面部创伤的模式与病因
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):114-117. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_233_18.
3
Fracture patterns and causes in the craniofacial region: an 8-year review of 2076 patients.颅面区域的骨折类型及成因:对2076例患者的8年回顾
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct 15;40(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40902-018-0168-y. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Maxillofacial Injuries in Women: A Retrospective Study of 10 Years.女性颌面部损伤:一项为期10年的回顾性研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Dec;16(4):438-444. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0954-y. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Fracture patterns in the maxillofacial region: a four-year retrospective study.颌面部骨折类型:一项为期四年的回顾性研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):306-16. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.6.306. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验