Bajzak Krisztina, Rains Alex, Bishop Lisa, Swab Michelle, Miller Michelle E, Logan Gabrielle S, Jackman Victoria, Jackman Liam, Gustafson Diana L
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Int J Sex Health. 2023 Jul 4;35(3):427-443. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2023.2222114. eCollection 2023.
Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) is a chronic pain condition without an identifiable cause that is localized to a portion of the vulva and provoked by pressure or touch. LPV is a commonly occurring but poorly understood condition lacking consensus on management.
This scoping review used Arksey and O'Malley's approach to identify and evaluate literature published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed the question: What is the current evidence on the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in the management of LPV?
This review evaluated 18 papers reporting on the efficacy or effectiveness of oral, topical, and injectable medications. Seven of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Oral gabapentin and oral desipramine showed some improvement in sexual function compared to placebo. Small sample sizes and methodological issues limited confidence in interpreting findings. Pain was reduced in descriptive studies of tricyclic antidepressants, milnacipran, injectable anesthetics, and botulinum toxin. Where pain did not improve with treatment, some oral medications improved participants' mood and sexual function. Some topical agents may be effective in reducing peripherally mediated neuropathic pain. Botulinum toxin was the most well-studied injectable but yielded mixed outcomes related to pain, quality of life, and sexual function.
There is a lack of convincing evidence to draw conclusions about the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological therapies for LPV. The breadth of therapies for treating LPV warrants the development of evidence-based, consensus guidelines for measuring treatment outcomes and improving comparisons across studies. Recommendations for research include addressing methodological shortcomings and diversifying the participant pool to increase the generalizability of findings.
局限性激发性外阴痛(LPV)是一种慢性疼痛病症,病因不明,疼痛局限于外阴的某一部位,由压力或触摸引发。LPV较为常见,但人们对其了解不足,在治疗方面也缺乏共识。
本范围综述采用阿克斯和奥马利的方法,识别和评估2010年至2023年间发表的涉及以下问题的文献:药物治疗在LPV管理中的疗效或有效性的现有证据是什么?
本综述评估了18篇报告口服、局部和注射用药物疗效或有效性的论文。其中七项研究为随机对照试验。与安慰剂相比,口服加巴喷丁和口服地昔帕明在性功能方面有一定改善。样本量小和方法学问题限制了对研究结果解读的信心。在三环类抗抑郁药、米那普明、注射用麻醉剂和肉毒杆菌毒素的描述性研究中,疼痛有所减轻。在治疗后疼痛未改善的情况下,一些口服药物改善了参与者的情绪和性功能。一些局部用药可能对减轻外周介导的神经性疼痛有效。肉毒杆菌毒素是研究最多的注射用药物,但在疼痛、生活质量和性功能方面产生了混合结果。
缺乏令人信服的证据来得出关于LPV药物治疗疗效或有效性的结论。治疗LPV的疗法种类繁多,因此有必要制定基于证据的共识指南,以衡量治疗结果并改善研究间的比较。对研究的建议包括解决方法学缺陷和使参与者群体多样化,以提高研究结果的普遍性。