Santos-Silva Catarina, Ferreira-Cardoso Henrique, Silva Sónia, Vieira-Marques Pedro, Valente José Carlos, Almeida Rute, A Fonseca João, Santos Cristina, Azevedo Inês, Jácome Cristina
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Pediatrics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Apr 8;7:e52540. doi: 10.2196/52540.
The use of a smartphone built-in microphone for auscultation is a feasible alternative to the use of a stethoscope, when applied by physicians.
This cross-sectional study aims to assess the feasibility of this technology when used by parents-the real intended end users.
Physicians recruited 46 children (male: n=33, 72%; age: mean 11.3, SD 3.1 y; children with asthma: n=24, 52%) during medical visits in a pediatric department of a tertiary hospital. Smartphone auscultation using an app was performed at 4 locations (trachea, right anterior chest, and right and left lung bases), first by a physician (recordings: n=297) and later by a parent (recordings: n=344). All recordings (N=641) were classified by 3 annotators for quality and the presence of adventitious sounds. Parents completed a questionnaire to provide feedback on the app, using a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 5 ("totally agree").
Most recordings had quality (physicians' recordings: 253/297, 85.2%; parents' recordings: 266/346, 76.9%). The proportions of physicians' recordings (34/253, 13.4%) and parents' recordings (31/266, 11.7%) with adventitious sounds were similar. Parents found the app easy to use (questionnaire: median 5, IQR 5-5) and were willing to use it (questionnaire: median 5, IQR 5-5).
Our results show that smartphone auscultation is feasible when performed by parents in the clinical context, but further investigation is needed to test its feasibility in real life.
当由医生操作时,使用智能手机内置麦克风进行听诊是使用听诊器的一种可行替代方法。
这项横断面研究旨在评估该技术由真正的目标最终用户——家长使用时的可行性。
医生在一家三级医院的儿科门诊就诊期间招募了46名儿童(男性:n = 33,72%;年龄:平均11.3岁,标准差3.1岁;哮喘儿童:n = 24,52%)。使用一款应用程序在4个部位(气管、右前胸以及左右肺底部)进行智能手机听诊,首先由医生进行(录音:n = 297),随后由家长进行(录音:n = 344)。所有录音(N = 641)由3名注释者按照质量和附加音的存在情况进行分类。家长完成一份问卷,使用从1(“完全不同意”)到5(“完全同意”)的李克特量表对该应用程序提供反馈。
大多数录音质量良好(医生的录音:253/297,85.2%;家长的录音:266/346,76.9%)。有附加音的医生录音比例(34/253,13.4%)和家长录音比例(31/266,11.7%)相似。家长认为该应用程序易于使用(问卷:中位数5,四分位距5 - 5)并且愿意使用它(问卷:中位数5,四分位距5 - 5)。
我们的结果表明,家长在临床环境中进行智能手机听诊是可行的,但需要进一步研究以测试其在现实生活中的可行性。