Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):47006. doi: 10.1289/EHP13807. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
Diarrheal disease is a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality globally. Household water, sanitation, and handwashing (WASH) interventions can reduce exposure to diarrhea-causing pathogens, but meteorological factors may impact their effectiveness. Information about effect heterogeneity under different weather conditions is critical to refining these targeted interventions.
We aimed to determine whether temperature and precipitation modified the effect of low-cost, point-of-use WASH interventions on child diarrhea.
We analyzed data from a trial in rural Bangladesh that compared child diarrhea prevalence between clusters () that were randomized to different WASH interventions between 2012 and 2016 (NCT01590095). We matched temperature and precipitation measurements to diarrhea outcomes ( measurements, 6,921 children) by geographic coordinates and date. We estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) using generative additive models and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to assess the effectiveness of each WASH intervention under different weather conditions.
Generally, WASH interventions most effectively prevented diarrhea during monsoon season, particularly following weeks with heavy rain or high temperatures. The PR for diarrhea in the WASH interventions group compared with the control group was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.68) after 1 d of heavy rainfall, with a less-protective effect [ (95% CI: 0.60, 1.25)] when there were no days with heavy rainfall. Similarly, the PR for diarrhea in the WASH intervention group compared with the control group was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.75) following above-median temperatures vs. 0.91 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.35) following below-median temperatures. The influence of precipitation and temperature varied by intervention type; for precipitation, the largest differences in effectiveness were for the sanitation and combined WASH interventions.
WASH intervention effectiveness was strongly influenced by precipitation and temperature, and nearly all protective effects were observed during the rainy season. Future implementation of these interventions should consider local environmental conditions to maximize effectiveness, including targeted efforts to maintain latrines and promote community adoption ahead of monsoon seasons. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13807.
腹泻病是全球儿童发病率和死亡率的主要原因。家庭用水、环境卫生和手卫生(WASH)干预措施可减少接触腹泻病原体,但气象因素可能会影响其效果。了解不同天气条件下的效果异质性对于改进这些针对性干预措施至关重要。
我们旨在确定温度和降水是否会改变低成本、即时使用的 WASH 干预措施对儿童腹泻的影响。
我们分析了 2012 年至 2016 年在孟加拉国农村进行的一项试验的数据,该试验比较了不同 WASH 干预措施组( )与对照组( )之间的儿童腹泻患病率( 项测量值, 名儿童)。我们根据地理位置和日期将温度和降水测量值与腹泻结果进行匹配。我们使用生成加性模型和有针对性的最大似然估计来估计每个 WASH 干预措施在不同天气条件下的效果比(PR)。
通常情况下,WASH 干预措施在季风季节最能有效预防腹泻,尤其是在经历强降雨或高温的几周后。与对照组相比,强降雨后第 1 天,WASH 干预组的腹泻 PR 为 0.49(95%CI:0.35,0.68),而无强降雨日时,保护效果较差(95%CI:0.60,1.25)。同样,与对照组相比,WASH 干预组的腹泻 PR 在高于平均温度时为 0.60(95%CI:0.48,0.75),而在低于平均温度时为 0.91(95%CI:0.61,1.35)。降水和温度对干预类型的影响各不相同;对于降水,卫生和综合 WASH 干预的效果差异最大。
WASH 干预措施的有效性受到降水和温度的强烈影响,几乎所有的保护作用都在雨季观察到。未来实施这些干预措施时,应考虑当地的环境条件,以最大限度地提高效果,包括在季风季节前有针对性地努力维护厕所并促进社区采用。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13807.