McFarlane Colin
Durham University, UK.
Urban Stud. 2023 Jul;60(9):1548-1569. doi: 10.1177/00420980211014810. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
How might concepts of 'value' and 'population' illuminate the present and future of urban density? The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a public debate on density in the city. While some initially blamed density for the spread of the virus, others rightly cautioned against those claims. As the pandemic progressed, an imaginary of density-as-pathology gave way to a more nuanced geographical understanding of the urban dimensions of the crisis, focused on connections, spatial conditions, domestic 'overcrowding' and poverty. Throughout, an interrogation and reflection on urban density and its future unfolded, throwing into question the historical relationship between 'value' and 'population' in understandings of density. I argue for a new politics of value based on shifts in three interconnected domains - governance, form and knowledge - and identify implications for research on density in urban studies.
“价值”和“人口”的概念如何阐明城市密度的现状与未来?新冠疫情引发了一场关于城市密度的公开辩论。虽然起初有人将病毒传播归咎于密度,但也有人正确地对这些说法提出了警告。随着疫情的发展,将密度视为病理现象的观念逐渐让位于对危机城市层面更为细致入微的地理学理解,这种理解聚焦于联系、空间条件、家庭“过度拥挤”和贫困。自始至终,关于城市密度及其未来的审视与反思不断展开,使人们对密度理解中“价值”与“人口”之间的历史关系产生了质疑。我主张基于治理、形态和知识这三个相互关联领域的转变构建一种新的价值政治,并确定其对城市研究中密度研究的影响。