• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突破疫情社交泡沫:残疾与关于新冠疫情的社交媒体使用

Piercing the Pandemic Social Bubble: Disability and Social Media Use About COVID-19.

作者信息

Dobransky Kerry, Hargittai Eszter

机构信息

James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.

University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;65(12):1698-1720. doi: 10.1177/00027642211003146.

DOI:10.1177/00027642211003146
PMID:38603151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8010377/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing stay-at-home orders caused tremendous restrictions in social contacts, which led to increasing use of the internet for daily tasks and social interactions. As prior research has established, people with disabilities (PWD) had already been using the internet for such purposes prior to the pandemic, especially for health-related content. Through a national survey administered during the first few weeks of the pandemic in the United States, we explore how people with and without disabilities used social media to exchange information and engage in activities about COVID-19. Findings reveal that PWD were more engaged with information about COVID-19 than those without disabilities, even when controlling for sociodemographics and internet experiences and skills. These differences are especially pronounced concerning more active engagement such as sharing information, interacting, and supporting others on social media. Although the content is about a health crisis in which PWD are disproportionately vulnerable, these effects largely remain when we enter controls for health status, belonging to high-risk groups for COVID-19, and personal experiences with COVID-19. Findings highlight the benefits of universal design, both for PWD specifically, and for society more broadly, as the general population ramps up use of tools long fought for and used by PWD.

摘要

新冠疫情及随之而来的居家令极大限制了社交接触,这使得人们在日常任务和社交互动中越来越多地使用互联网。正如先前研究所表明的,在疫情之前,残疾人就已经出于此类目的使用互联网,尤其是用于获取与健康相关的内容。通过在美国疫情头几周进行的一项全国性调查,我们探究了残疾人和非残疾人如何利用社交媒体来交流有关新冠疫情的信息并参与相关活动。研究结果显示,即使在控制了社会人口统计学特征以及互联网使用经历和技能的情况下,残疾人比非残疾人更积极地参与有关新冠疫情的信息交流。这些差异在诸如在社交媒体上分享信息、互动以及支持他人等更积极的参与行为方面尤为明显。尽管内容是关于一场健康危机,在这场危机中残疾人面临的风险格外高,但当我们纳入健康状况、属于新冠疫情高危群体以及新冠疫情个人经历等控制变量后,这些影响在很大程度上依然存在。研究结果凸显了通用设计的益处,这不仅对残疾人尤其如此,对更广泛的社会群体也是如此,因为普通大众正在增加使用长期以来由残疾人争取并使用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec1/8010377/a35c3bf8fdc1/10.1177_00027642211003146-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec1/8010377/a35c3bf8fdc1/10.1177_00027642211003146-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec1/8010377/a35c3bf8fdc1/10.1177_00027642211003146-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Piercing the Pandemic Social Bubble: Disability and Social Media Use About COVID-19.突破疫情社交泡沫:残疾与关于新冠疫情的社交媒体使用
Am Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;65(12):1698-1720. doi: 10.1177/00027642211003146.
2
Effect of digital divide on people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间数字鸿沟对残疾人的影响。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1):101214. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101214. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
4
Employment Consequences of COVID-19 for People with Disabilities and Employers.新冠疫情对残疾人和雇主的就业后果。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):464-472. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10012-9. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Countries Response for People With Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.各国在新冠疫情期间对残疾人的应对措施。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 7;2:796074. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.796074. eCollection 2021.
6
Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19.物理距离限制时期通信中的数字不平等:以新冠疫情为例
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jul;120:106717. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
7
Examining the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community engagement for people with mobility disabilities.考察新冠疫情对行动障碍人士社区参与的影响。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1S):101212. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101212. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Long-term social restrictions and lack of work activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the daily lives of people with intellectual disabilities.长期的社会限制和 COVID-19 大流行期间缺乏工作活动:对智障人士日常生活的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Dec;45(24):4122-4132. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2147227. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research.新冠疫情全球大流行期间数字通信的变化:对数字不平等及未来研究的影响
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Sep 9;6(3):2056305120948255. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948255. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.美国成年人在社交媒体上发布新冠疫情相关内容时的种族和族裔数字鸿沟:二次调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 3;22(7):e20472. doi: 10.2196/20472.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in the long-term impact of the pandemic: moderators of COVID-related hardship, worry, and social support.个体在大流行长期影响方面的差异:与 COVID-19 相关困难、担忧和社会支持的调节因素。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):927-939. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03573-0. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
A call for inclusive public health communication to promote the health of neurodivergent communities during and post-COVID-19.呼吁开展包容性公共卫生宣传,以促进神经发育障碍群体在新冠疫情期间及之后的健康。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 May 5;5:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100388. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Relationship difficulties and "technoference" during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
From Zero to a National Data Set in 2 Weeks: Reflections on a COVID-19 Collaborative Survey Project.两周内从无到有建立全国数据集:关于一项新冠病毒合作调查项目的思考
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Aug 20;6(3):2056305120948196. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948196. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
The public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic for people with disabilities.应对新冠肺炎大流行中的残疾人士的公共卫生对策。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100943. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100943. Epub 2020 May 24.
3
Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness.
新冠疫情期间的人际关系困扰与“科技干扰”
J Soc Pers Relat. 2022 Nov;39(11):3204-3227. doi: 10.1177/02654075221093611.
4
Effect of COVID-19 on Internet Usage of People with Disabilities: A Secondary Data Analysis.COVID-19 对残疾人士互联网使用的影响:二次数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 25;19(13):7813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137813.
5
Effect of digital divide on people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间数字鸿沟对残疾人的影响。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1):101214. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101214. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
新冠疫情中的社交隔离:孤独感的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):525-527. doi: 10.1177/0020764020922269. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.2019冠状病毒病大流行的多学科研究重点:呼吁开展心理健康科学行动
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Life in the pandemic: Social isolation and mental health.疫情下的生活:社交隔离与心理健康。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2756-2757. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15290. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
An Online Life Like Any Other: Identity, Self-Determination, and Social Networking Among Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.《线上生活与线下无异:成年智障人士的身份认同、自我决定与社交网络》。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Jan;21(1):56-64. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0689. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Disability Items From the Current Population Survey (2008-2015) and Permanent Versus Temporary Disability Status.来自当前人口调查(2008 - 2015年)的残疾项目以及永久性与临时性残疾状况
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):706-708. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303666. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
A Social Model of Loneliness: The Roles of Disability, Social Resources, and Cognitive Impairment.一种孤独的社会模型:残疾、社会资源和认知障碍的作用。
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1020-1030. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw125.
9
Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: the case of contested illness.电子支持小组、患者消费者与医学化:以争议性疾病为例
J Health Soc Behav. 2008 Mar;49(1):20-36. doi: 10.1177/002214650804900103.
10
European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries.欧洲公民对电子健康服务的使用:七个国家的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 10;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53.