Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术后住院时间和出院去向:机器人辅助与手动技术的大型多中心倾向匹配比较。

Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large Multicenter Propensity Matched Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Techniques.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Stryker, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S1):S117-S123. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-arm assistance continues to gain popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for its potential to improve component placement accuracy and patient outcomes. Nonetheless, there is limited data on the impact of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) on hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge location. This study thus aimed to compare LOS, discharge location, and readmission rate for propensity-matched cohorts of RA-THA versus manual THA (M-THA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a multi-hospital database was performed to identify patients who underwent THA between January 2016 and December 2021 from surgeons who performed both RA-THA and M-THA at 77 geographically diverse hospitals. The RA-THA and M-THA cohorts were 1-to-1 matched based on patient sex, age, and body mass index, resulting in 8,536 patients per cohort. Insurance type, LOS, same-day discharge, discharge disposition, and 90-day all-cause readmission rate were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Average LOS was significantly shorter for RA-THA patients (1.39 ± 0.85 days) than for M-THA patients (1.48 ± 0.91 days, P < .001). Compared to 5.6% of M-THA patients, 5.3% of RA-THA patients underwent same-day discharge (P = .38). There were statistically significant differences in discharge disposition between cohorts, with more RA-THA cases discharged home without home healthcare compared to M-THA (47.9 versus 45.5%, P = .001) and fewer RA-THA cases discharged to a skilled nursing facility compared to M-THA (5.6 versus 6.9%, P = .001). The 90-day all-cause readmission rate for RA-THA cases was 3.0%, compared to 3.4% for M-THA cases (P = .26).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to M-THA, RA-THA had a shorter average LOS, a similar percentage of patients with same-day discharge, fewer patients who had skilled nursing facility discharge, and a similar all-cause 90-day readmission rate. These results may be of interest to surgeons participating in bundled payment programs and engaging in cost savings.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助在全髋关节置换术(THA)中越来越受欢迎,因为它有可能提高组件放置的准确性和患者的结果。尽管如此,关于机器人辅助 THA(RA-THA)对住院时间(LOS)和出院地点的影响的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在比较 RA-THA 与手动 THA(M-THA)的倾向匹配队列的 LOS、出院地点和再入院率。

方法

对多医院数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在 77 个地理位置不同的医院进行 RA-THA 和 M-THA 的外科医生的患者。根据患者的性别、年龄和体重指数,将 RA-THA 组和 M-THA 组 1:1 匹配,每组 8536 例。使用 Mann-Whitney U 和卡方检验比较保险类型、LOS、当日出院、出院处置和 90 天全因再入院率。

结果

RA-THA 患者的平均 LOS 明显短于 M-THA 患者(1.39 ± 0.85 天比 1.48 ± 0.91 天,P <.001)。与 M-THA 患者的 5.6%相比,RA-THA 患者当日出院的比例为 5.3%(P =.38)。两组出院处置存在统计学差异,与 M-THA 相比,更多的 RA-THA 患者出院回家且无需家庭医疗保健(47.9%比 45.5%,P =.001),与 M-THA 相比,RA-THA 患者出院到熟练护理设施的比例更低(5.6%比 6.9%,P =.001)。RA-THA 患者的 90 天全因再入院率为 3.0%,而 M-THA 患者为 3.4%(P =.26)。

结论

与 M-THA 相比,RA-THA 的平均 LOS 较短,当日出院的患者比例相似,熟练护理设施出院的患者比例较低,90 天全因再入院率相似。这些结果可能对参与捆绑支付计划和节约成本的外科医生感兴趣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验