Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Division of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3502-3507. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
Interest in outpatient/same-day discharge (SDD) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been increasing over the last several years. There is considerable debate in the literature regarding the complication and readmission rates of these patients. To evaluate and validate the safety and efficacy of our institutional SDD THA care pathway, we compared the outcomes of patients undergoing SDD THA with patients who had a similar comorbidity profile and underwent inpatient THA.
A retrospective review was conducted on 164 patients who underwent SDD THA from January 2015 to September 2016. The Risk of Readmission Tool, a validated risk stratification instrument, was applied to all inpatient THAs performed from June 2014 to December 2016. A cutoff Risk of Readmission Tool score < 3 was used to produce a cohort of 1858 inpatient THA patients, all of whom had a similar risk profile to patients who underwent SDD THA. Medicare patients were excluded from the inpatient THA cohort, which left a final inpatient sample of 1315 patients. Each cohort was evaluated for demographic variables, length of stay, 30-/90-day readmissions, and discharge disposition.
The SDD THA cohort had significantly lower body mass index (26.9 vs 28.2 kg/m; P = .002), had fewer minorities (89.6% vs 66.3% Caucasians; P < .001), was exclusively commercial insurance (100% vs 36.3%), had a shorter length of stay (0.37 vs 2.3 days, P < .001), and was exclusively discharged home (100% vs 92.6%). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between either cohort (SDD 0.6% vs inpatient 1.6%; P = .325). However, the SDD cohort had a significantly lower rate of 90-day readmissions than the inpatient cohort (0.6% vs 3.6%; P = .014).
The use of an institutional SDD THA care pathway can produce results with equivalent or better short-term outcomes than that of traditional inpatient THA.
近年来,人们对门诊/当天出院(SDD)全髋关节置换术(THA)的兴趣日益增加。文献中对于这些患者的并发症和再入院率存在相当大的争议。为了评估和验证我们机构 SDD THA 护理途径的安全性和有效性,我们比较了 SDD THA 患者与具有相似合并症特征并接受住院 THA 患者的结局。
对 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间接受 SDD THA 的 164 例患者进行回顾性研究。应用经验证的风险分层工具——再入院风险工具(Risk of Readmission Tool),对 2014 年 6 月至 2016 年 12 月期间所有接受住院 THA 的患者进行评分。使用再入院风险工具评分<3 作为切点,产生一个 1858 例住院 THA 患者的队列,这些患者的风险特征与 SDD THA 患者相似。将医疗保险患者排除在住院 THA 队列之外,最终的住院样本为 1315 例。评估每个队列的人口统计学变量、住院时间、30 天/90 天再入院率和出院去向。
SDD THA 队列的体重指数明显更低(26.9 与 28.2 kg/m;P =.002),少数民族患者比例更低(89.6%与 66.3%白人;P<.001),完全为商业保险(100%与 36.3%),住院时间更短(0.37 与 2.3 天,P<.001),仅 100%的患者出院回家。两组患者的 30 天再入院率无统计学差异(SDD 0.6%与住院患者 1.6%;P =.325)。然而,SDD 队列的 90 天再入院率明显低于住院患者(0.6%与 3.6%;P =.014)。
使用机构 SDD THA 护理途径可以产生与传统住院 THA 相当或更好的短期结果。