Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Albert Einstein Hospital College, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):505-514.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.449. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
In two randomized controlled trials, the outcomes of endovascular treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial lesions were compared with bypass surgery and considered a valid alternative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare both endovascular treatment options with the hypothesis that implantation of heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents (Viabahn [SECS]) or drug-eluting stents (ZilverPTX [DES]) are related to similar clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up.
In a post-hoc analysis, the SuperB trial and Zilverpass databases were merged. Patients in the endovascular treatment arms were included, and data was analyzed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) fashion. Data included baseline and lesion characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up data. The primary endpoint of this study was primary patency at 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were secondary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and all-cause mortality.
A total of 176 patients were included; 63 in the SECS arm and 113 in the DES arm. Through 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in primary patency (ITT: 63.4% vs 71.1%: P = .183 and PP: 60.8% vs 71.1%; P = .100). Secondary patency rates were not significantly different in the ITT analysis (86.5% vs 95.1%; P = .054), but in the PP analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of the DES group (SECS, 85.6% vs DES, 95.1%; P = .038). There was no significant difference in freedom from TLR between groups (79.6% vs 77.0%; P = .481). No major amputations were performed in the SECS group, and two were performed in the DES group (1.8%). Survival rate was 98.2% in the SECS group, and 91.3% in the DES group after 1-year follow-up (P = .106). Based on diagnosis (intermittent claudication vs chronic limb-threatening ischemia) no differences between patients with intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia were observed in primary patency, secondary patency and freedom from TLR.
Treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial disease with the heparin-bonded Viabahn endoprosthesis and the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent are related to similar primary and secondary patency, and TLR rates at 1 year, except for secondary patency in the PP analysis. This study further supports the endovascular treatment of long complex lesions in the femoropopliteal artery.
在两项随机对照试验中,比较腔内治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的结果与旁路手术,并将其视为有效的替代治疗方法。本研究旨在比较两种腔内治疗方法,假设肝素结合自膨式覆膜支架(Viabahn [SECS])或药物洗脱支架(ZilverPTX [DES])的植入与 1 年随访时的相似临床结果相关。
在后设分析中,合并了 SuperB 试验和 Zilverpass 数据库。纳入腔内治疗组的患者,并采用意向治疗(ITT)和方案(PP)分析数据。数据包括基线和病变特征、手术细节和随访数据。本研究的主要终点为 1 年随访时的一期通畅率。次要终点包括二期通畅率、靶病变血运重建(TLR)、肢体丧失和全因死亡率。
共纳入 176 例患者;SECS 组 63 例,DES 组 113 例。通过 1 年随访,一期通畅率无显著差异(ITT:63.4%比 71.1%:P=.183,PP:60.8%比 71.1%:P=.100)。ITT 分析中二期通畅率无显著差异(86.5%比 95.1%:P=.054),但在 PP 分析中,DES 组有显著差异(SECS,85.6%比 DES,95.1%:P=.038)。两组间 TLR 无显著差异(79.6%比 77.0%:P=.481)。SECS 组无主要截肢,DES 组有 2 例(1.8%)。SECS 组 1 年后生存率为 98.2%,DES 组为 91.3%(P=.106)。根据诊断(间歇性跛行与慢性肢体威胁性缺血),间歇性跛行和慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者在一期通畅率、二期通畅率和 TLR 无差异。
肝素结合 Viabahn 覆膜支架和 ZilverPTX 药物洗脱支架治疗复杂股腘动脉疾病,在 1 年时的一期和二期通畅率和 TLR 率相似,除了 PP 分析中的二期通畅率。本研究进一步支持腔内治疗股腘动脉长段复杂病变。