Suppr超能文献

对 SuperB 和 Zilverpass 试验治疗长而复杂股浅动脉病变的事后分析。

Post hoc analysis of the SuperB and Zilverpass trials for treatment of long and complex superficial femoral artery lesions.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Albert Einstein Hospital College, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):505-514.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.449. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In two randomized controlled trials, the outcomes of endovascular treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial lesions were compared with bypass surgery and considered a valid alternative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare both endovascular treatment options with the hypothesis that implantation of heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents (Viabahn [SECS]) or drug-eluting stents (ZilverPTX [DES]) are related to similar clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

In a post-hoc analysis, the SuperB trial and Zilverpass databases were merged. Patients in the endovascular treatment arms were included, and data was analyzed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) fashion. Data included baseline and lesion characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up data. The primary endpoint of this study was primary patency at 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were secondary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients were included; 63 in the SECS arm and 113 in the DES arm. Through 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in primary patency (ITT: 63.4% vs 71.1%: P = .183 and PP: 60.8% vs 71.1%; P = .100). Secondary patency rates were not significantly different in the ITT analysis (86.5% vs 95.1%; P = .054), but in the PP analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of the DES group (SECS, 85.6% vs DES, 95.1%; P = .038). There was no significant difference in freedom from TLR between groups (79.6% vs 77.0%; P = .481). No major amputations were performed in the SECS group, and two were performed in the DES group (1.8%). Survival rate was 98.2% in the SECS group, and 91.3% in the DES group after 1-year follow-up (P = .106). Based on diagnosis (intermittent claudication vs chronic limb-threatening ischemia) no differences between patients with intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia were observed in primary patency, secondary patency and freedom from TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial disease with the heparin-bonded Viabahn endoprosthesis and the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent are related to similar primary and secondary patency, and TLR rates at 1 year, except for secondary patency in the PP analysis. This study further supports the endovascular treatment of long complex lesions in the femoropopliteal artery.

摘要

目的

在两项随机对照试验中,比较腔内治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的结果与旁路手术,并将其视为有效的替代治疗方法。本研究旨在比较两种腔内治疗方法,假设肝素结合自膨式覆膜支架(Viabahn [SECS])或药物洗脱支架(ZilverPTX [DES])的植入与 1 年随访时的相似临床结果相关。

方法

在后设分析中,合并了 SuperB 试验和 Zilverpass 数据库。纳入腔内治疗组的患者,并采用意向治疗(ITT)和方案(PP)分析数据。数据包括基线和病变特征、手术细节和随访数据。本研究的主要终点为 1 年随访时的一期通畅率。次要终点包括二期通畅率、靶病变血运重建(TLR)、肢体丧失和全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入 176 例患者;SECS 组 63 例,DES 组 113 例。通过 1 年随访,一期通畅率无显著差异(ITT:63.4%比 71.1%:P=.183,PP:60.8%比 71.1%:P=.100)。ITT 分析中二期通畅率无显著差异(86.5%比 95.1%:P=.054),但在 PP 分析中,DES 组有显著差异(SECS,85.6%比 DES,95.1%:P=.038)。两组间 TLR 无显著差异(79.6%比 77.0%:P=.481)。SECS 组无主要截肢,DES 组有 2 例(1.8%)。SECS 组 1 年后生存率为 98.2%,DES 组为 91.3%(P=.106)。根据诊断(间歇性跛行与慢性肢体威胁性缺血),间歇性跛行和慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者在一期通畅率、二期通畅率和 TLR 无差异。

结论

肝素结合 Viabahn 覆膜支架和 ZilverPTX 药物洗脱支架治疗复杂股腘动脉疾病,在 1 年时的一期和二期通畅率和 TLR 率相似,除了 PP 分析中的二期通畅率。本研究进一步支持腔内治疗股腘动脉长段复杂病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验