Suppr超能文献

多组分流程在医院环境下识别和优先考虑低价值医疗服务:范围综述。

Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review.

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):e078761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078761.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review mapped and synthesised original research that identified low-value care in hospital settings as part of multicomponent processes.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature were last searched 11 July and 3 June 2022, respectively, with no language or date restrictions.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included original research targeting the identification and prioritisation of low-value care as part of a multicomponent process in hospital settings.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Screening was conducted in duplicate. Data were extracted by one of six authors and checked by another author. A framework synthesis was conducted using seven areas of focus for the review and an overuse framework.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven records were included (21 original studies, 4 abstracts and 2 reviews), originating from high-income countries. Benefit or value (11 records), risk or harm (10 records) were common concepts referred to in records that explicitly defined low-value care (25 records). Evidence of contextualisation including barriers and enablers of low-value care identification processes were identified (25 records). Common components of these processes included initial consensus, consultation, ranking exercise or list development (16 records), and reviews of evidence (16 records). Two records involved engagement of patients and three evaluated the outcomes of multicomponent processes. Five records referenced a theory, model or framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Gaps identified included applying systematic efforts to contextualise the identification of low-value care, involving people with lived experience of hospital care and initiatives in resource poor contexts. Insights were obtained regarding the theories, models and frameworks used to guide initiatives and ways in which the concept 'low-value care' had been used and reported. A priority for further research is evaluating the effect of initiatives that identify low-value care using contextualisation as part of multicomponent processes.

摘要

目的

本范围综述绘制并综合了原始研究,这些研究确定了医院环境中作为多组分过程一部分的低价值医疗。

设计

范围综述。

数据来源

电子数据库(EMBASE、PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane CENTRAL)和灰色文献,分别于 2022 年 7 月 11 日和 6 月 3 日最后检索,无语言或日期限制。

入选标准

我们纳入了以确定和优先考虑医院环境中多组分过程中的低价值医疗为目标的原始研究。

数据提取和综合

筛选由两名作者进行重复操作。数据由六名作者中的一名提取,另一名作者进行核对。使用综述的七个重点领域和一个过度使用框架进行框架综合。

结果

共纳入 27 项记录(21 项原始研究、4 项摘要和 2 项综述),来自高收入国家。明确界定低价值医疗的记录中经常提到受益或价值(11 项记录)和风险或危害(10 项记录)这两个概念。确定了低价值医疗识别过程的背景化的证据,包括障碍和促进因素(25 项记录)。这些过程的常见组成部分包括初步共识、咨询、排名练习或清单制定(16 项记录)以及证据审查(16 项记录)。两项记录涉及患者的参与,三项记录评估了多组分过程的结果。五项记录引用了理论、模型或框架。

结论

确定的差距包括有系统地努力使低价值医疗的识别背景化、让有医院护理经验的人参与以及在资源匮乏的环境中开展倡议。我们获得了有关指导倡议的理论、模型和框架以及“低价值医疗”这一概念的使用和报告方式的见解。进一步研究的重点是评估使用多组分过程中背景化来识别低价值医疗的倡议的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c72/11015208/ff9c1e2e03b9/bmjopen-2023-078761f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验