• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人医院医学中的明智选择:临床医生和患者倡导者共同制定新建议,以提高医疗保健的价值。

Choosing Wisely in Adult Hospital Medicine: Co-creation of New Recommendations for Improved Healthcare Value by Clinicians and Patient Advocates.

机构信息

New York City Health and Hospitals, 50 Water Street, New York, NY, 10013, USA.

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2454-2461. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07269-4. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-07269-4
PMID:35668237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Choosing Wisely campaign has resulted in a vast number of recommendations to reduce low-value care. Implementation of these recommendations, in conjunction with patient input, remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To create updated Society of Hospital Medicine Adult Hospitalist Choosing Wisely recommendations that incorporate patient input from inception.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a multi-phase study conducted by the Society of Hospital Medicine's High Value Care Committee from July 2017 to January 2020 involving clinicians and patient advocates.

APPROACH

Phase 1 involved gathering low-value care recommendations from patients and clinicians across the USA. Recommendations were reviewed by the committee in phase 2. Phase 3 involved a modified Delphi scoring in which 7 committee members and 7 patient advocates voted on recommendations based on strength of evidence, potential for patient harm, and relevance to either hospital medicine or patients. A patient-friendly script was developed to allow advocates to better understand the clinical recommendations.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 1265 recommendations were submitted by clinicians and patients. After accounting for similar suggestions, 283 recommendations were categorized. Recommendations with more than 10 mentions were advanced to phase 3, leaving 22 recommendations for the committee and patient advocates to vote upon. Utilizing a 1-5 Likert scale, the top combined recommendations were reducing use of opioids (4.57), improving sleep (4.52), minimizing overuse of oxygen (4.52), reducing CK-MB use (4.50), appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (4.43), and decreasing daily chest x-rays (4.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific voting categories, along with the use of patient-friendly language, allowed for the successful co-creation of recommendations.

摘要

背景

美国内科医师学会基金会的“明智选择”活动提出了大量减少低价值医疗的建议。这些建议的实施以及患者的参与仍然具有挑战性。

目的

制定新的“医院医学学会成人医院医师明智选择”建议,从一开始就纳入患者的意见。

设计和参与者

这是一项由医院医学学会高价值护理委员会进行的多阶段研究,涉及临床医生和患者权益倡导者,从 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月进行。

方法

第 1 阶段涉及从美国各地的患者和临床医生那里收集低价值医疗建议。第 2 阶段由委员会审查建议。第 3 阶段涉及修改后的德尔菲评分,其中 7 名委员会成员和 7 名患者权益倡导者根据证据强度、对患者潜在危害以及对医院医学或患者的相关性,对建议进行投票。制定了一个患者友好的脚本,以允许权益倡导者更好地理解临床建议。

主要结果

临床医生和患者共提交了 1265 条建议。在考虑到相似的建议后,将 283 条建议进行了分类。有 10 次以上提及的建议被推进到第 3 阶段,留下 22 条建议供委员会和患者权益倡导者投票。利用 1-5 级李克特量表,排名最高的综合建议是减少阿片类药物的使用(4.57)、改善睡眠(4.52)、尽量减少过度使用氧气(4.52)、减少 CK-MB 的使用(4.50)、适当的静脉血栓栓塞预防(4.43)和减少每日胸部 X 光检查(4.43)。

结论

具体的投票类别,以及使用患者友好的语言,使得建议的成功共同制定成为可能。

相似文献

1
Choosing Wisely in Adult Hospital Medicine: Co-creation of New Recommendations for Improved Healthcare Value by Clinicians and Patient Advocates.成人医院医学中的明智选择:临床医生和患者倡导者共同制定新建议,以提高医疗保健的价值。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2454-2461. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07269-4. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Choosing Wisely in Pediatric Hospital Medicine: 5 New Recommendations to Improve Value.明智选择儿科医院医学:5 项新建议以提高价值。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Nov;11(11):1179-1190. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006037. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Choosing wisely in pediatric hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value.明智选择儿科医院医疗:提高医疗保健价值的五个机会。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Sep;8(9):479-85. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2064. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
4
Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value.成人医院医学中的明智选择:提高医疗保健价值的五个机会。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Sep;8(9):486-92. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2063. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Choosing Wisely in Critical Care: Results of a National Survey From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative.明智选择在重症监护:来自重症监护学会协作组的全国性调查结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):331-336. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003496.
7
Choosing Wisely and Promoting High-Value Care and Staff Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large Safety Net System.在一个大型安全网系统的新冠疫情期间明智选择并促进高价值医疗与员工安全
Qual Manag Health Care. 2024;33(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000431. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
Evaluating the feasibility and utility of translating Choosing Wisely recommendations into e-Measures.评估将明智选择建议翻译成电子措施的可行性和实用性。
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Mar;3(1):24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
9
An official American Thoracic Society/American Association of Critical-Care Nurses/American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine policy statement: the Choosing Wisely® Top 5 list in Critical Care Medicine.美国胸科学会/美国危重病护理护士协会/美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会官方政策声明:危重病医学中的明智选择® 前 5 名列表。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 1;190(7):818-26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1317ST.
10
A Broader View of Quality: Choosing Wisely Recommendations From Other Specialties With High Relevance to Emergency Care.更广义的质量观:选择明智——与急诊护理高度相关的其他专业的推荐意见。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.041.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Acupressure on Sleep Quality Among Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.穴位按压对住院患者睡眠质量的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70075. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70075.
2
Monitoring low-value care in medical patients from Swiss university hospitals using a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) national data stream and patient and public involvement: LUCID study protocol.利用可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用(FAIR)的国家数据流以及患者和公众参与,监测瑞士大学医院内科患者的低价值医疗:LUCID研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e089662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089662.
3
Resident Physicians Can Promote Environmental Health and Climate-Informed Health Care.住院医师可以促进环境健康和气候信息指导的医疗保健。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6 Suppl):35-39. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00175.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
4
How to decrease routine and repetitive blood tests in hospitalized patients.如何减少住院患者的常规和重复性血液检查。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Nov-Dec;70(11-12):701-703. doi: 10.46747/cfp.701112701.
5
Validation of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) risk scores for venous thromboembolism and bleeding in an independent population.国际静脉血栓栓塞症预防登记处(IMPROVE)静脉血栓栓塞症和出血风险评分在独立人群中的验证。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 May 15;8(4):102441. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102441. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review.多组分流程在医院环境下识别和优先考虑低价值医疗服务:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):e078761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078761.
7
Methodological progress note: De-implementation of low-value care.方法学进展说明:低价值医疗的废除。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):57-61. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13257. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review.共同创建医疗保健护理人员的技术解决方案:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e41260. doi: 10.2196/41260.
9
Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers.迈向公平的开放研究:利益相关者共同为研究机构、资助者和研究人员制定的建议
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 1;10(2):221460. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221460. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Dose Tapering With Overdose or Mental Health Crisis Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioids.长期服用阿片类药物患者中剂量递减与过量用药或心理健康危机的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 3;326(5):411-419. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11013.
2
Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement.脉搏血氧饱和度测量中的种族偏见。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2477-2478. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2029240.
3
A Multifaceted, Student-Led Approach to Improving the Opioid Prescribing Practices of Hospital Medicine Clinicians.一种多方面、以学生为主导的方法,旨在改善医院医学临床医生的阿片类药物处方实践。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;46(3):153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
5
Sleepless in the hospital: A systematic review of non-pharmacological sleep interventions.医院里的失眠:非药物睡眠干预措施的系统评价。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;59:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
Effectiveness of SIESTA on Objective and Subjective Metrics of Nighttime Hospital Sleep Disruptors.SIESTA 对夜间医院睡眠干扰的客观和主观指标的有效性。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):38-41. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3091.
7
Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline.急性病内科患者的氧疗:临床实践指南
BMJ. 2018 Oct 24;363:k4169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4169.
8
Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性危重病患者接受宽松与保守氧疗的死亡率和发病率(IOTA):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1693-1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30479-3. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Engagement in Eliminating Overuse: The Argument for Safety and Beyond.参与消除过度使用:安全及其他方面的理由。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):313-315. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000487.
10
Right Care in Hospital Medicine: Co-creation of Ten Opportunities in Overuse and Underuse for Improving Value in Hospital Medicine.医院医学中的合理医疗:共同创造十个过度使用和使用不足方面的机会以提高医院医学价值。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):804-806. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4371-4.