• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确保资源有限环境下制定的癌症管理指南具有质量:使用系统方法。

Ensuring quality in contextualised cancer management guidelines for resource-constraint settings: using a systematic approach.

机构信息

Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009584.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009584
PMID:35985695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9396157/
Abstract

To address the wide variation in access to cancer care in India requires strengthening of infrastructure, trained oncology workforce, and minimisation of out-of-pocket expenditures. However, even with major investments, it is unlikely to achieve the same level of infrastructure and expertise across the country. Therefore, a resource stratified approach driven by evidence-based and contextualised clinical guidelines is the need of the hour. The National Cancer Grid has been at the forefront of delivery of standardised cancer care through several of its initiatives, including the resource-stratified guidelines. Development of new guidelines is resource and time intensive, which may not be feasible and can delay the implementation. Adaptation of the existing standard guidelines using the transparent and well-documented methodology with involvement of all stakeholders can be one of the most reasonable pathways. However, the adaptation should be done keeping in mind the context, resource availability, budget impact, investment needed for implementation and acceptability by clinicians, patients, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The present paper provides the framework for systematically developing guidelines through adaptation and contextualisation. The process can be used for other health conditions in resource-constraint settings.

摘要

为了解决印度癌症治疗可及性的巨大差异,需要加强基础设施、培训肿瘤学专业人员,并减少自付支出。然而,即使进行了重大投资,也不太可能在全国范围内实现相同水平的基础设施和专业知识。因此,需要一种基于循证和情境化临床指南的资源分层方法。国家癌症网格通过其多项举措,包括资源分层指南,一直处于提供标准化癌症治疗的前沿。制定新的指南需要资源和时间,这可能不可行,并可能延迟实施。使用透明和记录完善的方法,让所有利益相关者参与,对现有标准指南进行改编可以是最合理的途径之一。但是,改编时应考虑到背景、资源可用性、预算影响、实施所需的投资以及临床医生、患者、政策制定者和其他利益相关者的可接受性。本文提供了通过改编和情境化来系统制定指南的框架。该过程可用于资源有限环境中的其他健康状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea9/9396157/d65c01d867f8/bmjgh-2022-009584f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea9/9396157/d65c01d867f8/bmjgh-2022-009584f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea9/9396157/d65c01d867f8/bmjgh-2022-009584f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Ensuring quality in contextualised cancer management guidelines for resource-constraint settings: using a systematic approach.确保资源有限环境下制定的癌症管理指南具有质量:使用系统方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009584.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Views from Multidisciplinary Oncology Clinicians on Strengthening Cancer Care Delivery Systems in Tanzania.多学科肿瘤临床医生对加强坦桑尼亚癌症护理提供系统的看法。
Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1197-e1204. doi: 10.1002/onco.13834. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
8
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
9
Using context-specific evidence to inform resource-stratified cancer guidelines: A call for a new approach.利用特定背景证据为资源分层癌症指南提供信息:呼吁采用新方法。
Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35573. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35573. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
10
The central role of provider training in implementing resource-stratified guidelines for palliative care in low-income and middle-income countries: Lessons from the Jamaica Cancer Care and Research Institute in the Caribbean and Universidad Católica in Latin America.在中低收入国家实施资源分层姑息治疗指南中,提供者培训的核心作用:来自加勒比地区牙买加癌症护理和研究所及拉丁美洲天主教大学的经验。
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126 Suppl 10:2448-2457. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32857.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol for developing deprescribing clinical practice guidelines: evidence-based GRADE methodology and a Delphi consensus method.制定减药临床实践指南的研究方案:基于证据的GRADE方法和德尔菲共识法。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06202-2.
2
Global and regional disparities in access to specialist sarcoma services.全球及区域在获得肉瘤专科服务方面的差异。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Apr 11;6(4):425-431. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0208.R1.
3
Health benefits package selection in oncology: a clinical audit of palliative chemotherapy for breast cancer in an Indian health insurance scheme.

本文引用的文献

1
A Reporting Tool for Adapted Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist.一种适用于医疗保健改编指南的报告工具:RIGHT-Ad@pt 清单。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 May;175(5):710-719. doi: 10.7326/M21-4352. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.适应新环境的干预措施——ADAPT 指南。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1679.
3
Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries.适应性健康技术评估,以促进低收入和中等收入国家的优先事项设定。
肿瘤学中的健康福利套餐选择:对印度一项健康保险计划中乳腺癌姑息化疗的临床审计
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12018-4.
4
Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review.多组分流程在医院环境下识别和优先考虑低价值医疗服务:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):e078761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078761.
5
Highlights from cancer Choosing Wisely Nepal 2022: critical appraisal skills for evidence-based practice, 24th-25th September 2022, Kathmandu, Nepal.2022年尼泊尔癌症明智选择活动亮点:循证实践的批判性评估技能,2022年9月24日至25日,尼泊尔加德满都
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Nov 28;16:1478. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1478. eCollection 2022.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004549.
4
Importance of Evidence-Based Health Insurance Reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment for Achieving Universal Health Coverage and Improved Access to Health in India.基于证据的健康保险报销和卫生技术评估对印度实现全民健康覆盖及改善医疗服务可及性的重要性。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.04.007. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Defining key questions for clinical practice guidelines: a novel approach for developing clinically relevant questions.定义临床实践指南的关键问题:一种开发临床相关问题的新方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Sep 29;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00628-3.
6
Cost of Treatment for Cervical Cancer in India.印度宫颈癌治疗费用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):2639-2646. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.9.2639.
7
Evaluation of 1-Year vs Shorter Durations of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Among Patients With Early Breast Cancer: An Individual Participant Data and Trial-Level Meta-analysis.早期乳腺癌患者辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗 1 年与更短时间的疗效评估:一项个体参与者数据和试验水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2011777. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11777.
8
Cancer Statistics, 2020: Report From National Cancer Registry Programme, India.《2020年癌症统计数据:来自印度国家癌症登记计划的报告》
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jul;6:1063-1075. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00122.
9
Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview.个体、医疗体系及具体环境因素对临床实践指南实施的阻碍与促进作用:系统元分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 29;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8.
10
Assessment of Knowledge and Screening in Oral, Breast, and Cervical Cancer in the Population of the Northeast Region of India.印度东北部地区人群口腔癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌的知识评估和筛查。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Apr;6:601-609. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00257.