Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Goba Referral Hospital, Madda Walabu University, Bale Goba, Ethiopia.
Departments of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Apr 12;27(1):e120. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000855.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of food insecurity on perinatal depression in rural Ethiopia. DESIGN: We used a prospective cohort in which food insecurity was considered as primary exposure and perinatal depression as an outcome. Food insecurity at baseline (in the period of 8-24 weeks of pregnancy) was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), and perinatal depression at follow-up (in 32-36 weeks of pregnancy) was measured using a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). We used multivariable regression to assess the effect of food insecurity on the prevalence of perinatal depression. We explored food insecurity's direct and indirect impacts on perinatal depression using structural equation modelling (SEM). SETTING: This paper used data from the Butajira Nutrition, Mental Health and Pregnancy (BUNMAP) cohort established under the Butajira Health and Demographic Surveillance Site (BHDSS). PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred and fifty-five pregnant women. RESULTS: Among the study participants, 50 % were food-insecure, and about one-third were depressed at 32-36 follow-up. In SEM, higher values of baseline food insecurity, depressive symptoms and state-trait anxiety (STA) were positively and significantly associated with perinatal depression. The direct impact of food insecurity on perinatal depression accounts for 42 % of the total effect, and the rest accounted for the indirect effect through baseline depression (42 %) and STA (16 %). CONCLUSION: The significant effect of food insecurity at baseline on perinatal depression and the indirect effect of baseline food insecurity through baseline anxiety and depression in the current study implies the importance of tailored interventions for pregnant women that consider food insecurity and psychosocial problems.
目的:评估埃塞俄比亚农村地区食物不安全对围产期抑郁的影响。
设计:我们使用了前瞻性队列研究,其中食物不安全被视为主要暴露因素,围产期抑郁为结局。在基线(妊娠 8-24 周期间)使用家庭食物不安全评估量表(HFIAS)测量食物不安全,在随访时(妊娠 32-36 周期间)使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)测量围产期抑郁。我们使用多变量回归评估食物不安全对围产期抑郁患病率的影响。我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)探索食物不安全对围产期抑郁的直接和间接影响。
设置:本文使用了在布塔吉拉健康和人口监测点(BHDSS)下建立的布塔吉拉营养、心理健康和妊娠(BUNMAP)队列的数据。
参与者:755 名孕妇。
结果:在研究参与者中,有 50%的人食物不安全,约三分之一的人在 32-36 随访时抑郁。在 SEM 中,基线食物不安全、抑郁症状和状态-特质焦虑(STA)值越高,与围产期抑郁呈正相关且显著相关。基线食物不安全对围产期抑郁的直接影响占总效应的 42%,其余通过基线抑郁(42%)和 STA(16%)的间接效应解释。
结论:本研究中基线食物不安全对围产期抑郁的显著影响以及基线食物不安全通过基线焦虑和抑郁对围产期抑郁的间接影响,意味着需要为孕妇量身定制干预措施,考虑食物不安全和心理社会问题。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018-2-14
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015-10-8
Public Health Nutr. 2017-11-20
J Fam Psychol. 2025-6-30
Prev Med Rep. 2023-7-1
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022-2-7
J Public Health Res. 2021-12-2
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021-10-6