College of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
School of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural Engineering University, Jinan, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;12:1252817. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1252817. eCollection 2024.
In response to the increasing demand for long-term care services for older people, the Chinese government has launched a pilot program for long-term care insurance (LTCI) since 2016. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of this program in China and provide recommendations for the future development and expansion of the LTCI system.
We developed a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess these LTCI policies implemented in all 49 pilot cities in China.
Based on our evaluation, the average assessment score for the LTCI program across all pilot cities was 71.8 points, with scores ranging from 57.5 to 92.5 points in these cities. Furthermore, most of the pilot cities achieved higher scores in the fact-based assessment compared to the value-based assessment.
The results suggested that the overall pilot effect regarding LTCI was favorable, but there were significant regional disparities. Moreover, in most of pilot cities, current LTCI policies were designed to alleviate both the financial burden and the burden of caring for people with disabilities that families faced. However, some challenges still remained, such as the lack of community and home-based care services, the need to expand the coverage of insurance, and the importance of diversifying funding sources.
为应对老年人对长期护理服务日益增长的需求,中国政府自 2016 年起启动了长期护理保险(LTCI)试点计划。本研究旨在评估该计划在中国的实施情况和效果,并为未来 LTCI 系统的发展和扩大提供建议。
我们制定了一个综合评估框架,以评估中国所有 49 个试点城市实施的这些 LTCI 政策。
根据我们的评估,所有试点城市的 LTCI 计划平均评估得分为 71.8 分,这些城市的得分范围为 57.5 至 92.5 分。此外,与基于价值的评估相比,大多数试点城市在基于事实的评估中获得了更高的分数。
结果表明,LTCI 的总体试点效果良好,但存在显著的地区差异。此外,在大多数试点城市,现行的 LTCI 政策旨在减轻家庭面临的残疾人和经济负担。然而,仍存在一些挑战,例如缺乏社区和家庭护理服务、需要扩大保险覆盖范围以及多样化资金来源的重要性。