• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理保险对中国医疗费用和健康状况的影响。

The Impact of the Long-Term Care Insurance on the Medical Expenses and Health Status in China.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China.

School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 May 6;10:847822. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.847822. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.847822
PMID:35646763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9130047/
Abstract

Based on the panel data of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2011, 2015, and 2018, this paper used the difference-in-difference (DID) method to evaluate the implementation effect how the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) policy impacted on the medical expenses and the health status of the middle-aged and elder population. The empirical results show that LTCI has reduced the outpatient and inpatient quantity by 0.1689 and 0.1093 per year, and cut the outpatient and inpatient expenses by 23.9% and 19.8% per year. Moreover, the implementation of LTCI has improved the self-rated health, the activity of daily living (ADL), as well as the mental health. These conclusions verify the implementation value of LTCI system and provide policy implications for the medical reform and the further LTCI implementation in a larger scale.

摘要

基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011、2015 和 2018 年的面板数据,本文采用双重差分(DID)方法评估长期护理保险(LTCI)政策对中年和老年人口医疗费用和健康状况的实施效果。实证结果表明,LTCI 使门诊和住院量每年分别减少 0.1689 和 0.1093,门诊和住院费用每年分别减少 23.9%和 19.8%。此外,LTCI 的实施提高了自评健康、日常生活活动(ADL)以及心理健康水平。这些结论验证了 LTCI 制度的实施价值,并为医疗改革和更大规模的进一步 LTCI 实施提供了政策启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/38be156f5745/fpubh-10-847822-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/ea989786a65c/fpubh-10-847822-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/83d74975a6db/fpubh-10-847822-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/1249e78128b8/fpubh-10-847822-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/de301a840d38/fpubh-10-847822-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/be9b76652b55/fpubh-10-847822-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/38be156f5745/fpubh-10-847822-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/ea989786a65c/fpubh-10-847822-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/83d74975a6db/fpubh-10-847822-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/1249e78128b8/fpubh-10-847822-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/de301a840d38/fpubh-10-847822-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/be9b76652b55/fpubh-10-847822-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/357a/9130047/38be156f5745/fpubh-10-847822-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of the Long-Term Care Insurance on the Medical Expenses and Health Status in China.长期护理保险对中国医疗费用和健康状况的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 6;10:847822. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.847822. eCollection 2022.
2
The Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on Medical Utilization and Expenditures: Evidence from Jingmen, China.长期护理保险对医疗利用和支出的影响:来自中国荆门的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912275.
3
Value-Based Health Care: Long-Term Care Insurance for Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses and Self-Rated Health.基于价值的医疗保健:用于自付医疗费用和自评健康的长期护理保险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010192.
4
Does long-term care insurance reduce the disability among middle-aged and older adults? Evidence from China.长期护理保险是否降低了中老年人群的失能发生率?来自中国的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16057-0.
5
Effects of the Long-term Care Insurance on Health Among Older Adults: A Panel Data From China.长期护理保险对老年人健康的影响:来自中国的面板数据
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7664. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7664. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Evaluating the long-term care insurance policy from medical expenses and health security equity perspective: evidence from China.从医疗费用和健康保障公平性角度评估长期护理保险政策:来自中国的证据
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;80(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00761-7.
7
Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China.长期护理保险与老年人及其家庭的福祉:来自中国的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114745. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114745. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
Impact of long-term care insurance on the health status of middle-aged and older adults.长期护理保险对中老年人群健康状况的影响。
Health Econ. 2023 Mar;32(3):558-573. doi: 10.1002/hec.4634. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
9
The impacts of long-term care insurance on health care utilization and expenditure: evidence from China.长期护理保险对医疗保健利用和支出的影响:来自中国的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jun 13;37(6):717-727. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac003.
10
Long-term care insurance and multidimensional poverty of middle-aged and elderly: Evidence from China.长期护理保险与中老年多维贫困:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;11:1100146. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1100146. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving healthcare efficiency through long-term care insurance (LTCI): a super-SBM and DID analysis of 291 Chinese cities.通过长期护理保险提高医疗保健效率:对291个中国城市的超效率SBM和双重差分分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 21;13:1619791. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619791. eCollection 2025.
2
Quantitative analysis of the diffusion characteristics of China's long-term care insurance policy based on the PMC index model.基于PMC指数模型的中国长期护理保险政策扩散特征定量分析
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1467062. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1467062. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of long-term care insurance on medical expenditure and utilization and the comparison between different pilot schemes: evidence from China.

本文引用的文献

1
Substitute services: a barrier to controlling long-term care expenditures.替代服务:控制长期护理支出的一个障碍。
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Jun 11;18(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00570-x. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Health Insurance and Long-Term Care Services for the Disabled Elderly in China: Based on CHARLS Data.中国残疾老年人的健康保险与长期护理服务:基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)数据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Feb 25;13:155-162. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S233949. eCollection 2020.
3
Provider Incentives and Healthcare Costs: Evidence from Long-Term Care Hospitals.
长期护理保险对医疗支出和利用的影响以及不同试点方案之间的比较:来自中国的证据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):1379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22610-w.
4
Evaluation of long-term care insurance pilot city policies in China: a cross-sectional study.中国长期护理保险试点城市政策评估:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;13:1570794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570794. eCollection 2025.
5
The impact of long-term care insurance on healthcare utilization and expenditures among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a quasi-experiment study.长期护理保险对中国中年及以上成年人医疗保健利用和支出的影响:一项准实验研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 14;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02297-y.
6
Effect of long-term care insurance on medical expenditure and health status: National cohort study.长期护理保险对医疗支出和健康状况的影响:全国队列研究。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Sep 12;82(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01388-0.
7
The effect of long-term care insurance on women's health outcomes in China: evidence from a disability inclusion action.长期护理保险对中国女性健康结果的影响:来自一项残疾包容行动的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):2262. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19800-3.
8
Psychosocial Well-Being Differences Between the Young Old, Old-Old, and Oldest Old: A Global Comparison.年轻老人、高龄老人和老老人之间的心理社会幸福感差异:一项全球比较。
J Aging Health. 2024 Jul 20:8982643241264587. doi: 10.1177/08982643241264587.
9
Long-term care needs and hospitalization costs with long-term care insurance: a mixed-sectional study.长期护理需求和长期护理保险的住院费用:一项混合截面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;12:1226884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1226884. eCollection 2024.
10
Effects of the Long-term Care Insurance on Health Among Older Adults: A Panel Data From China.长期护理保险对老年人健康的影响:来自中国的面板数据
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7664. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7664. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
医疗服务提供者激励措施与医疗成本:来自长期护理医院的证据。
Econometrica. 2018 Nov;86(6):2161-2219. doi: 10.3982/ECTA15022.
4
Does long-term care insurance reduce the burden of medical costs? A retrospective elderly cohort study.长期护理保险是否减轻了医疗费用负担?一项回顾性老年队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Dec;18(12):1641-1646. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13536. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Impact of social care supply on healthcare utilisation by older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社会护理供给对老年人医疗保健利用的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):57-66. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy147.
6
Does long-term care subsidization reduce hospital admissions and utilization?长期护理补贴是否减少了住院人数和利用?
J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;58:43-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Financing elderly people's long-term care needs: Evidence from China.为老年人的长期护理需求提供资金:来自中国的证据。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):479-488. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2488. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Spillover effect of Japanese long-term care insurance as an employment promotion policy for family caregivers.日本长期护理保险作为促进家庭护工就业政策的溢出效应。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Long-term care is increasingly concentrated in the last years of life: a change from 2000 to 2011.长期护理越来越集中在生命的最后几年:这是 2000 年至 2011 年的变化。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):665-669. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw260.
10
Considering long-term care insurance for middle-income countries: comparing South Korea with Japan and Germany.考虑中等收入国家的长期护理保险:韩国与日本和德国的比较
Health Policy. 2015 Oct;119(10):1319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 11.