从不同面部角度呈现犯罪者和无辜嫌疑人的面孔会影响目击者记忆的易感性吗？对错误信息效应和目击者错误指认的调查。
Does presenting perpetrator and innocent suspect faces from different facial angles influence the susceptibility of eyewitness memory? An investigation into the misinformation effect and eyewitness misidentification.
作者信息
Deering Kara, Colloff Melissa F, Bennett Tia C, Flowe Heather D
机构信息
Applied Memory Lab, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 28;14:1213996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213996. eCollection 2023.
INTRODUCTION
This study investigated the effects of face angle congruency across stages of a misinformation paradigm on lineup discrimination accuracy.
METHODS
In a between-subjects design, participants viewed a mock crime with the perpetrator's face from the front or profile angle. They then read a news report featuring an innocent suspect's image from the same or different angle as the perpetrator had been shown. A subsequent lineup manipulated perpetrator presence and viewing angle of the lineup members, who were all shown either from the front or in profile.
RESULTS
No significant difference emerged in identification errors based on angle congruency between stages. However, accuracy was higher when faces were shown from the front angle, both during the initial event and the lineup, compared to the profile angle.
DISCUSSION
The results of this research underscore the importance of considering viewing angles in the construction of lineups.
引言
本研究调查了在错误信息范式的各个阶段中，面部角度一致性对列队辨认准确性的影响。
方法
在一项被试间设计中，参与者观看了一段模拟犯罪视频，视频中犯罪者的面部为正面或侧面角度。然后，他们阅读了一篇新闻报道，报道中出现了一名无辜嫌疑人的图像，该图像与犯罪者所展示的角度相同或不同。随后的列队辨认环节对犯罪者是否在场以及列队成员的观看角度进行了操控，所有列队成员均以正面或侧面展示。
结果
基于各阶段之间角度一致性的识别错误没有显著差异。然而，与侧面角度相比，在初始事件和列队辨认过程中，当面部以正面角度展示时，准确性更高。
讨论
本研究结果强调了在列队辨认构建过程中考虑观看角度的重要性。
Zotero 插件