• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用扫描电子显微镜对血管移植物和血管内移植物感染的体外研究。

An ex vivo study of infections of vascular grafts and endografts with scanning electron microscopy.

机构信息

Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, UMR 5234 CNRS, ARMYNE, Bordeaux, France.

Department of Vascular Surgery, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):554-563.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.015
PMID:38608967
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs) are complicated by high morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates, notably due to biofilm formation on the graft surface, hardly dislodgeable by the sole anti-infectious treatment. The characteristics of this biofilm are still poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo biofilm on removed infected vascular grafts and endografts (VGEs).

METHODS

Explanted VGEs were prospectively collected from 2019 to 2022 at Bordeaux University Hospital, France. Two samples per graft were used for scanning electron microscopy imaging; one was sonicated, and both grafts' sides were imaged.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were included, 18 with VGEI, eight without any infection (endoleak and/or thrombosis), and 29 VGEs were collected. Microbial documentation was obtained in 83% of VGEIs. A thick layer of fibrin was visible on almost all grafts, mixed with a dense biofilm matrix on infected grafts visible as early as 1 month after the onset of infection. Bacteria were not always visualized on infected grafts' surface (80% on outer side and 85% on luminal side) but were surprisingly present on one-third of non-infected grafts. There was no significant difference between biofilm, fibrin, and microorganisms' distribution between the two grafts' sides. However, there were clear differences between infected and non-infected grafts, since immune cells, bacteria and biofilm were more frequently visualized on both sides of infected grafts (P < .05). Bacteria and immune cells although still visible, were significantly less present after sonication; the number of other elements including biofilm was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The persistence of a thick layer of fibrin and biofilm embedding microorganisms on both sides of infected VGE even after 1 month of infection could be the explanation for the low success rates of conservative management and the usual need for graft removal to treat VGEIs.

摘要

目的

血管移植物和血管内移植物感染(VGEI)发病率、死亡率和复发率高,这主要是由于移植物表面形成生物膜,仅通过抗感染治疗很难清除。生物膜的特征仍未得到充分记录。本研究旨在评估从法国波尔多大学医院取出的感染血管移植物和血管内移植物(VGE)的体外生物膜。

方法

前瞻性收集了 2019 年至 2022 年在法国波尔多大学医院的 VGE 感染患者的 VGE。每个移植物使用两个样本进行扫描电子显微镜成像;一个样本进行超声处理,两个移植物的侧面都进行成像。

结果

共纳入 26 例患者,18 例为 VGEI,8 例无任何感染(内漏和/或血栓形成),共收集 29 个 VGE。83%的 VGEI 患者获得了微生物学证据。几乎所有移植物上都可见一层厚厚的纤维蛋白,感染移植物上可见一层密集的生物膜基质,感染后 1 个月即可观察到。感染移植物表面并不总是能看到细菌(80%的外侧面和 85%的内腔面),但令人惊讶的是,三分之一的非感染移植物上存在细菌。生物膜、纤维蛋白和微生物在两个移植物侧面的分布无显著差异。然而,感染和非感染移植物之间存在明显差异,因为在感染移植物的两面都更频繁地观察到免疫细胞、细菌和生物膜(P <.05)。尽管超声处理后仍能观察到细菌和免疫细胞,但它们的存在明显减少;生物膜等其他元素的数量无显著差异。

结论

感染 VGE 后 1 个月,即使在感染的 VGE 两侧仍存在厚厚的纤维蛋白层和嵌入微生物的生物膜,这可能是保守治疗成功率低以及通常需要移植物切除来治疗 VGEI 的原因。

相似文献

1
An ex vivo study of infections of vascular grafts and endografts with scanning electron microscopy.应用扫描电子显微镜对血管移植物和血管内移植物感染的体外研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):554-563.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
A multicenter experience with infected abdominal aortic endograft explantation.感染性腹主动脉内移植物取出术的多中心经验
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.126. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
3
The relevance of aortic endograft prosthetic infection.主动脉内移植物假体感染的相关性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.067. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
4
Treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with infected aortic endografts.感染性主动脉覆膜支架腔内移植物患者的治疗策略和结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.047. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
5
Graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后移植物感染。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.111. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
6
The management of endograft infections following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aneurysm repair.胸腹部血管内动脉瘤修复术后带血管移植物感染的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;58(5):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.040. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
7
Deep Femoral Vein Reconstruction of the Abdominal Aorta and Adaptation of the Neo-Aortoiliac System Bypass Technique in an Endovascular Era.腹主动脉股深静脉重建及血管腔内时代新主动脉-髂动脉系统旁路技术的应用
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Jan;53(1):28-34. doi: 10.1177/1538574418801100. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
Guided Aspiration for Determining the Microbiological Aetiology of Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections.导丝吸引在确定主动脉血管移植物和覆膜支架感染的微生物病因学中的应用。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;62(6):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection.主动脉腔内移植物感染的治疗与预后
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;63(2):332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.113.
10
A systematic review of infected descending thoracic aortic grafts and endografts.感染性降主动脉移植物和血管内移植物的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1941-1951.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.108. Epub 2019 Jan 1.