Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Surgery. 2024 Jul;176(1):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.034. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
The impact of county-level food access on mortality associated with steatotic liver disease, as well as post-liver transplant outcomes among individuals with steatotic liver disease, have not been characterized.
Data on steatotic liver disease-related mortality and outcomes of liver transplant recipients with steatotic liver disease between 2010 and 2020 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control Prevention mortality as well as the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases. These data were linked to the food desert score, defined as the proportion of the total population in each county characterized as having both low income and limited access to grocery stores.
Among 2,710 counties included in the analytic cohort, median steatotic liver disease-related mortality was 27.3 per 100,000 population (interquartile range 24.9-32.1). Of note, patients residing in counties with high steatotic liver disease death rates were more likely to have higher food desert scores (low: 5.0, interquartile range 3.1-7.8 vs moderate: 6.1, interquartile range, 3.8-9.3 vs high: 7.6, interquartile range 4.1-11.7). Among 28,710 patients who did undergo liver transplantation, 5,310 (18.4%) individuals lived in counties with a high food desert score. Liver transplant recipients who resided in counties with the worst food access were more likely to have a higher body mass index (>35 kg/m: low food desert score, 17.3% vs highest food desert score, 20.1%). After transplantation, there was no difference in 2-year graft survival relative to county-level food access (food desert score: low: 88.4% vs high: 88.6%; P = .77).
Poor food access was associated with a higher incidence rate of steatotic liver disease-related death, as well as lower utilization of liver transplants. On the other hand, among patients who did receive a liver transplant, there was no difference in 2-year graft survival regardless of food access strata. Policy initiatives should target the expansion of transplantation services to vulnerable communities in which there is a high mortality of steatotic liver disease.
县级食物获取对脂肪性肝病相关死亡率的影响,以及脂肪性肝病患者肝移植后的预后,尚未得到明确。
从疾病控制与预防中心死亡率数据库以及移植受者科学注册处数据库中获取了 2010 年至 2020 年期间脂肪性肝病相关死亡率和脂肪性肝病肝移植受者结局的数据。这些数据与食物荒漠得分相关联,定义为每个县的总人口中既有低收入又有限制获得杂货店的比例。
在分析队列中包含的 2710 个县中,中位数脂肪性肝病相关死亡率为每 10 万人 27.3 人(四分位距 24.9-32.1)。值得注意的是,居住在脂肪性肝病死亡率较高的县的患者更有可能食物荒漠得分较高(低:5.0,四分位距 3.1-7.8 与中:6.1,四分位距 3.8-9.3 与高:7.6,四分位距 4.1-11.7)。在 28710 例接受肝移植的患者中,有 5310 例(18.4%)患者生活在食物荒漠得分较高的县。居住在食物获取最差的县的肝移植受者更有可能有较高的体重指数(>35 kg/m:低食物荒漠得分,17.3%与最高食物荒漠得分,20.1%)。移植后,2 年移植物存活率与县一级食物获取无关(食物荒漠得分:低:88.4%与高:88.6%;P=0.77)。
食物获取较差与脂肪性肝病相关死亡率的发生率较高有关,与肝移植的利用率较低有关。另一方面,在接受肝移植的患者中,无论食物获取水平如何,2 年移植物存活率无差异。政策举措应针对扩大脆弱社区的移植服务,这些社区脂肪性肝病死亡率较高。