• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Trajectory of Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Open to Laparoscopic to Robotic.减重手术的修正轨迹:从开放手术到腹腔镜手术再到机器人手术。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1878. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071878.
2
Single- or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单吻合口或双吻合口十二指肠转位术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术作为袖状胃切除术的翻修术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Apr;15(4):556-566. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of re-sleeve, Roux en-Y gastric bypass, duodenal switch (Roux en-Y and single-anastomosis).袖状胃切除术后再次手术的短期疗效:再行袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术、十二指肠转位术(Roux-en-Y 和单吻合术)的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4644-4652. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07891-z. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Robotic bariatric surgery reduces morbidity for revisional gastric bypass when compared to laparoscopic: outcome of 8-year MBSAQIP analysis of over 40,000 cases.机器人减重手术与腹腔镜手术相比,减少了再手术胃旁路术的发病率:超过 40000 例 MBSAQIP 分析 8 年的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6294-6304. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11192-0. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.机器人与腹腔镜减重手术翻修术的对比分析:来自 MBSAQIP 数据库的围手术期结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Mar;16(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Current Trends in the Utilization of a Robotic Approach in the Field of Bariatric Surgery.当前减重手术领域中机器人应用的趋势。
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):482-491. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06378-1. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
[Analysis of the 1-year curative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with super obesity].[袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术联合单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术以及胆胰转流十二指肠转位术治疗超级肥胖患者的1年疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):859-865. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221025-00431.
8
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助减重手术翻修术的疗效:一项对MBSAQIP数据库的回顾性病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1573-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach.修订式减重手术共识声明:采用改良 Delphi 法。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1648-1657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06937-1. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Recurrence or Inadequate Weight Loss: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database.袖状胃切除术后体重复发或减重不足的翻修手术:MBSAQIP数据库分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 15;12(18):5975. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185975.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists Among Individuals Undergoing Bariatric Surgery in the US.美国接受减肥手术的个体中胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂的使用情况。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3089.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic revision to Toupet fundoplication for failed Nissen fundoplication: a single-center experience.机器人与腹腔镜辅助胃底折叠术治疗尼森胃底折叠术失败:单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 7;18(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02124-0.

本文引用的文献

1
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.美国代谢与减重外科学会 2022 年美国代谢与减重手术实施预估。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 May;20(5):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Revisional Bariatric Surgery due to Complications: Indications and Outcomes.减重手术后并发症的再次手术:适应证和结果。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3463-3471. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06832-8. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Efficacy and safety of revisional treatments for weight regain or insufficient weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后体重反弹或减重不足的修正治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2023 Oct;24(10):e13607. doi: 10.1111/obr.13607. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Recurrence and Surgical Non-responders.袖状胃切除术的长期结果:体重复发与手术无反应者。
Obes Surg. 2023 Oct;33(10):3028-3034. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06730-z. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence.肥胖症外科医生视角下的减重手术后体重复发的再次手术治疗(RBS)。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Sep;19(9):972-979. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Impact of Early Gastrojejunal Stenosis on Weight Loss in Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.早期胃空肠狭窄对接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术患者体重减轻的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):202-206. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001165.
7
Predictors of marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胃旁路术后边缘性溃疡的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1066-1077. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05619-7. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Comparison of early post-operative complications in primary and revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and duodenal switch MBSAQIP-reported cases from 2015 to 2019.比较 2015 年至 2019 年 MBSAQIP 报告的原发性和翻修腹腔镜袖状胃切除术、胃旁路术和十二指肠转流术的术后早期并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3728-3738. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09796-5. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of benign gastrointestinal tract strictures: a single-center experience and proposed treatment algorithm.用于治疗良性胃肠道狭窄的防黏膜贴合型金属支架:单中心经验和治疗方案建议。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2133-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09715-8. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Duodenal Switch Conversion in Non-responders or Weight Recurrence Patients.十二指肠转位术在无反应者或体重复发患者中的应用
Obes Surg. 2022 Dec;32(12):3984-3991. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06297-1. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

减重手术的修正轨迹:从开放手术到腹腔镜手术再到机器人手术。

The Trajectory of Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Open to Laparoscopic to Robotic.

作者信息

Jawhar Noura, Sample Jack W, Salame Marita, Marrero Katie, Tomey Daniel, Puvvadi Suraj, Ghanem Omar M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Carle Foundation Hospital General Surgery Residency, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1878. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071878.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13071878
PMID:38610643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11012271/
Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity, with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) being the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure. Long-term studies have demonstrated that 15-20% of patients require revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) due to weight-related issues or surgical complications. Despite the gold standard being laparoscopic revision, there are other available approaches such as open or robotic-assisted. An extensive literature review was performed for articles from their inception to February 2024. A descriptive review of MBS procedures (SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) and biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS)) was carried out to report and compare outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery. A similar review was conducted to compare outcomes of revisional approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic). RYGB remains the dominant RBS with a similar safety profile compared to revisional SADI and BPD-DS. In terms of the RBS surgical approach, all three options showed comparable short and long-term outcomes, with robotic RBS being associated with longer operative time and variable length of stay. Additional long-term studies are required to further validate our conclusions.

摘要

代谢与减重手术(MBS)是肥胖患者最有效的治疗干预手段,其中袖状胃切除术(SG)是最常实施的主要MBS术式。长期研究表明,15%至20%的患者因体重相关问题或手术并发症需要进行减重手术翻修术(RBS)。尽管腹腔镜翻修术是金标准,但还有其他可用方法,如开放手术或机器人辅助手术。对从文章发表之初到2024年2月的文献进行了广泛综述。对MBS术式(SG、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)、单吻合十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI)和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术(BPD-DS))进行了描述性综述,以报告和比较初次与翻修减重手术的结果。进行了类似的综述以比较翻修方法(开放、腹腔镜、机器人辅助)的结果。与翻修SADI和BPD-DS相比,RYGB仍然是主要的RBS术式,且安全性相当。就RBS手术方式而言,所有三种选择的短期和长期结果相当,机器人辅助RBS手术时间更长,住院时间不一。需要更多长期研究来进一步验证我们的结论。