Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Pain Pract. 2024 Sep;24(7):882-890. doi: 10.1111/papr.13371. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
Lumbar spine surgery is a common procedure for treating disabling spine-related pain. In recent decades, both the number and cost of spine surgeries have increased despite technological advances and modification in surgical technique. For those patients that have continued uncontrolled back and/or lower extremity pain following lumbar spine surgery, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, the impact of lumbar spine surgical history remains largely unstudied. Specifically, the current study considers the impact of number of prior lumbar spine surgeries on pain relief outcomes following SCS implantation.
We queried the electronic medical record of five separate pain practices for all patients who have undergone a SCS implant between January 1, 2017, and March 1, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of any patients with an SCS implant who underwent a prior lumbar spine surgery. The primary outcome was the mean calculated percentage pain relief in patients based on number of prior lumbar spine surgeries.
There was a total of 1974 total SCS implant cases identified across five separate pain clinics. There was no difference in mean calculated pain relief in patients with one prior spine surgery versus those with two or more prior spine surgeries (28.2% vs. 25.8%, adjusted β-coefficient -3.1, 95% CI -8.9 to 2.7, p = 0.290). Similarly, when analyzing number of spine surgeries as a continuous variable, there was no association between number of spine surgeries and calculated pain relief (adjusted β-coefficient -1.5, 95% CI -4.0 to 1.1, p = 0.257). Additionally, after patients were stratified based on waveform, there was no association between number of prior lumbar spine surgeries (analyzed both as a categorical and continuous variable) and calculated percentage pain relief.
This multicentered retrospective study found that there was no significant difference in pain scores in individuals who received SCS following one or more lumbar spine surgeries. Additionally, the waveform of the SCS device had no statistically significant impact on post-operative pain scores following one or more lumbar spine surgeries.
腰椎脊柱手术是治疗脊柱相关疼痛的常用方法。尽管技术进步和手术技术不断改进,但近几十年来,脊柱手术的数量和成本都在增加。对于那些在接受腰椎脊柱手术后仍持续出现无法控制的背部和/或下肢疼痛的患者,脊髓刺激 (SCS) 已成为一种可行的治疗选择。然而,腰椎脊柱手术史的影响在很大程度上仍未得到研究。具体而言,本研究考虑了先前腰椎脊柱手术次数对 SCS 植入后疼痛缓解效果的影响。
我们查询了五家不同疼痛诊所的电子病历,以获取 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 1 日期间接受 SCS 植入术的所有患者的信息。纳入标准包括接受 SCS 植入术且之前接受过腰椎脊柱手术的任何患者。主要结局是根据先前的腰椎脊柱手术次数,计算患者的平均疼痛缓解百分比。
在五家不同的疼痛诊所共发现 1974 例 SCS 植入病例。在先前有一次脊柱手术的患者与有两次或更多脊柱手术的患者之间,平均计算的疼痛缓解率没有差异(28.2%与 25.8%,调整后的β系数-3.1,95%CI-8.9 至 2.7,p=0.290)。同样,当将脊柱手术次数作为连续变量进行分析时,脊柱手术次数与计算的疼痛缓解之间也没有关联(调整后的β系数-1.5,95%CI-4.0 至 1.1,p=0.257)。此外,根据波形对患者进行分层后,先前的腰椎脊柱手术次数(分别作为分类和连续变量进行分析)与计算的疼痛缓解百分比之间也没有关联。
这项多中心回顾性研究发现,在接受 SCS 治疗的个体中,接受一次或多次腰椎脊柱手术后,疼痛评分没有显著差异。此外,在接受一次或多次腰椎脊柱手术后,SCS 设备的波形对术后疼痛评分没有统计学上的显著影响。