Zhang Jiashuo, Li Xuebo, Li Liangliang, Chen Anqi, Zhang Suhua
Research Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Key Laboratory of Evidence Identification in Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan, China.
Forensic Sci Res. 2024 Apr 12;9(2):owae020. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae020. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The goal of the following study is to clarify whether the skeletal remains over 70 years old from missing persons and their alleged relatives shared identical Y-STR loci. Nowadays, advances in ancient DNA extraction techniques and approaches of using multiple different Y-STRs have significantly increased the possibility of obtaining DNA profiles from highly degraded skeletal remains. Given the ages and conditions of the skeletal remains, ancient DNA extraction methods can be used to maximize the probability of DNA recovery. Considering that information about distant relatives is more relevant for long-term missing persons and alleged family members are male, Y-STR loci analysis is considered the most appropriate and informative approach for determining paternal lineage relationship. In this study, Y-STR genotypes obtained from these alleged relatives were identical to each other and to the alleles of missing persons' consensus profiles at more than 22 loci examined, whilst not being found in Y-STR population database from Y-Chromosome STR Haplotype Reference Database. Therefore, Missing Person No.7 and Missing Person No.18 have a patrilineal relationship with reference samples from Family1 and Family2, respectively. In addition, the fact that Y-STR haplotypes obtained from skeletal remains of missing persons and reference samples are not found in the Han Chinese people from East Asian demonstrates its rarity and further supports a paternal lineage relationship amongst them.
以下研究的目的是澄清来自失踪人员及其所谓亲属的70岁以上骨骼遗骸是否共享相同的Y-STR基因座。如今,古代DNA提取技术和使用多种不同Y-STR的方法的进步显著提高了从高度降解的骨骼遗骸中获取DNA图谱的可能性。考虑到骨骼遗骸的年龄和状况,可以使用古代DNA提取方法来最大限度地提高DNA回收的概率。鉴于远亲信息与长期失踪人员更为相关,且所谓的家庭成员为男性,Y-STR基因座分析被认为是确定父系谱系关系的最合适和最具信息量的方法。在本研究中,从这些所谓亲属获得的Y-STR基因型彼此相同,并且与在超过22个检测位点上失踪人员的一致图谱的等位基因相同,而在Y染色体STR单倍型参考数据库的Y-STR群体数据库中未发现。因此,失踪人员7号和失踪人员18号分别与来自家庭1和家庭2的参考样本有父系关系。此外,从失踪人员和参考样本的骨骼遗骸中获得的Y-STR单倍型在东亚汉族人群中未发现,这一事实证明了其稀有性,并进一步支持了他们之间的父系谱系关系。