Impieri Lorenzo, Pezzi Andrea, Hadad Henrique, Peretti Giuseppe M, Mangiavini Laura, Rossi Nicolò
Residency Program in Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bone Rep. 2024 Apr 6;21:101760. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101760. eCollection 2024 Jun.
BACKGROUND: Fracture healing poses a significant challenge in orthopedics. Successful regeneration of bone is provided by mechanical stability and a favorable biological microenvironment. This systematic review aims to explore the clinical application of orthobiologics in treating aseptic delayed union and non-union of long bones in adults. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases were explored, with no date restrictions, using keywords related to orthobiologics and delayed union and non-union. Eligible studies included human clinical studies in English, with available full texts, examining orthobiologics such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) for treating aseptic delayed unions and non-unions in adults. Animal studies, in vitro research, and studies on non-unions due to congenital defects, tumors or infections were excluded. RESULTS: The initial search identified 9417 studies, with 20 ultimately included in the review. These studies involved 493 patients affected by non-union and 256 patients affected by delayed union, with an average age respectively of 40.62 years and 41.7 years. The mean follow-up period was 15.55 months for non-unions and 8.07 months for delayed unions. PRP was the most used orthobiologic, and outcomes were evaluated through time to union, functional scores, and clinical examinations. The results indicated that orthobiologics, especially PRP, tended to yield better outcomes compared to surgical procedures without biological factors. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that orthobiologics, such as PRP, BMPs, and MSCs, can be effective and safe in the management of delayed union and non-union fractures. These biological treatments have the potential to improve union rates, reduce healing times, and enhance functional outcomes in patients with non-union fractures. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and determine the most suitable orthobiologic for specific patient populations and fracture types.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022-1-4
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024-10
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025-6-28
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-5-8
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025-4-12
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-1-26
Biomedicines. 2024-11-28
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024-10-21
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023-12
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023-10
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023-8
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022-7
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022-3-25
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022-1-4