• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间政府指导方针中的指令:一项国际比较。

Directives in Covid-19 government guidance: an international comparison.

作者信息

Vincent Benet, Power Kate, Crosthwaite Peter, Gardner Sheena

机构信息

Coventry University.

University of Queensland.

出版信息

Appl Corpus Linguistics. 2023 Jun 22:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100063.

DOI:10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100063
PMID:38620162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10286526/
Abstract

The importance of language to changing public behaviours is acknowledged in crisis situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic. A key means of achieving these changes is through the use of directive speech acts, yet this area is currently under-researched. This study investigates the use of directives in the 2020 COVID-19 briefings of four leaders of English-speaking nations, Jacinda Adern, Boris Johnson, Scott Morrison, and Nicola Sturgeon. We developed a classification system including 13 directive types and used this to compare directive use across these four leaders, examining directness and forcefulness of directive use. The analysis finds Sturgeon to be the most prolific directive user and also to have the highest reliance on imperatives. Johnson, meanwhile, has a preference for directives involving modal verbs, particularly with first- and second-person pronouns. In contrast, Ardern and Morrison show a higher use of indirect directives, normally thought to be a less effective strategy. While Ardern often combines this strategy with judicious use of imperatives, this is not seen in Morrison's COVID-19 briefings. These findings tend to confirm earlier, more impressionistic evaluations of the communication styles of these leaders but also suggest other avenues for research on directive use. We conclude with implications for political crisis communication and analysis of directives in crisis communication.

摘要

在新冠疫情等危机情况下,语言对于改变公众行为的重要性已得到认可。实现这些改变的一个关键手段是使用指令性言语行为,但目前这一领域的研究还不够充分。本研究调查了2020年四个英语国家领导人——杰辛达·阿德恩、鲍里斯·约翰逊、斯科特·莫里森和尼古拉·斯特金——在新冠疫情简报中的指令性言语行为的使用情况。我们开发了一个包含13种指令类型的分类系统,并以此比较这四位领导人的指令性言语行为的使用情况,考察指令性言语行为使用的直接性和力度。分析发现,斯特金是使用指令性言语行为最多的人,而且对祈使句的依赖程度也最高。与此同时,约翰逊则偏好使用包含情态动词的指令,尤其是与第一和第二人称代词搭配时。相比之下,阿德恩和莫里森更多地使用间接指令,而间接指令通常被认为是一种效果较差的策略。虽然阿德恩经常将这种策略与明智地使用祈使句相结合,但在莫里森的新冠疫情简报中却没有这种情况。这些发现倾向于证实此前对这些领导人沟通风格的更具印象主义色彩的评价,但也为指令性言语行为使用的研究提出了其他途径。我们最后探讨了这些发现对政治危机沟通以及危机沟通中指令性言语行为分析的启示。

相似文献

1
Directives in Covid-19 government guidance: an international comparison.新冠疫情期间政府指导方针中的指令:一项国际比较。
Appl Corpus Linguistics. 2023 Jun 22:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100063.
2
The 'team of 5 million': The joint construction of leadership discourse during the Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand.“五百万人团队”:新西兰新冠疫情期间领导力话语的共建
Discourse Context Media. 2021 Oct;43:100523. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100523. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Britain's COVID-19 battle: The role of political leaders in shaping the responses to the pandemic.英国的新冠疫情之战:政治领导人在塑造疫情应对措施中的作用。
Br J Polit Int Relat. 2023 Aug;25(3):517-534. doi: 10.1177/13691481231159021. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
4
Fighting COVID-19 with the team of 5 million: Aotearoa New Zealand government communication during the 2020 lockdown.与500万人团队共同抗击新冠疫情:2020年封锁期间新西兰政府的沟通情况
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100209. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts.推特#Covid19NZ帖子中的指令、礼貌与立场。
J Pragmat. 2022 Jul;196:6-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic.科学在危机中的作用:COVID-19 大流行期间政治领导人的讲话。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0282529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282529. eCollection 2023.
7
"Do as I say but not as I do": Influence of political leaders' populist communication styles on public adherence in a crisis using the global case of COVID-19 movement restrictions.“照我说的做,别照我做的做”:以新冠疫情行动限制这一全球案例探讨政治领导人的民粹主义沟通风格对危机期间公众遵守情况的影响
Data Inf Manag. 2023 Jun;7(2):100039. doi: 10.1016/j.dim.2023.100039. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
8
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
9
Words matter: political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic.用词很重要:对 COVID-19 大流行期间各国政府首脑讲话的政治和性别分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003910.
10
Twitter Mediated Sociopolitical Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in India.印度新冠疫情危机期间推特介导的社会政治传播
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:784907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784907. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The reception of public health messages during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间公众健康信息的接收情况。
Appl Corpus Linguistics. 2023 Apr;3(1):100037. doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100037. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
2
Analysis of crisis communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.澳大利亚总理在新冠疫情期间的危机沟通分析。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Aug;62:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102375. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
3
Words matter: political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic.用词很重要:对 COVID-19 大流行期间各国政府首脑讲话的政治和性别分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003910.
4
Social representations, identity threat, and coping amid COVID-19.社会表征、身份威胁与新冠疫情期间的应对
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S249-S251. doi: 10.1037/tra0000773. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
David Oliver: Covid-19 highlights the need for effective government communications.大卫·奥利弗:新冠疫情凸显了政府进行有效沟通的必要性。
BMJ. 2020 May 13;369:m1863. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1863.
6
Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.有效的健康传播——抗击新冠疫情的关键因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 May;103(5):873-876. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027.
7
Letter to the Editor: On the term 'interaction' and related phrases in the literature on Random Forests.致编辑的信:关于随机森林文献中“交互作用”一词及相关表述
Brief Bioinform. 2015 Mar;16(2):338-45. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbu012. Epub 2014 Apr 9.