Suppr超能文献

科学在危机中的作用:COVID-19 大流行期间政治领导人的讲话。

The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0282529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282529. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, science has been prominently featured in institutional communication and political agendas as never before. Governments substantially relied on scientific experts to analyze pandemic trends, develop anti-COVID-19 vaccines and adopt containment strategies. In this paper, we analyze speeches by three political leaders-Boris Johnson (Prime Minister, UK), Sergio Mattarella (President of the Republic, Italy), and Ursula von der Leyen (President, European Commission)-between February 20, 2020, and February 20, 2022, to identify how science was addressed and framed. The results of the quantitative and qualitative exploration of the speeches highlight three main ways in which political leaders view science: a national pride narrative-i.e., science as an instrument and indicator of national pride and international standing of the country; an ethical narrative-i.e., science as an agent of social growth; an integration narrative-i.e., science as a driving force of both European integration and stronger collaboration between knowledge production and industry. The predominant narrative varies in relation to the political leaders' different institutional contexts and roles.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,科学在机构传播和政治议程中前所未有的突出。政府在很大程度上依赖科学专家来分析大流行趋势、开发抗 COVID-19 疫苗和采取遏制策略。在本文中,我们分析了三位政治领导人——鲍里斯·约翰逊(英国首相)、塞尔焦·马塔雷拉(意大利共和国总统)和乌尔苏拉·冯·德莱恩(欧盟委员会主席)——在 2020 年 2 月 20 日至 2022 年 2 月 20 日期间的演讲,以确定科学是如何被提及和构建的。对演讲进行定量和定性探索的结果突出了政治领导人看待科学的三种主要方式:一种是民族自豪感的叙述,即科学是国家自豪感和国际地位的工具和指标;一种是伦理叙述,即科学是社会发展的推动者;一种是融合叙述,即科学是欧洲一体化和知识生产与产业之间更紧密合作的驱动力。主要叙述因政治领导人不同的制度背景和角色而有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a0/10038249/97a00bdd7b61/pone.0282529.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0282529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282529. eCollection 2023.
3
Political Leaders' Communication Strategies during COVID-19 in Highly Infected Countries: A Scoping Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):607. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060607.
7
Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;11:1285552. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285552. eCollection 2023.
8
Adaptation of the National Plan for the Prevention and Fight Against Pandemic Influenza to the 2020 COVID-19 Epidemic in France.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Dec;14(6):805-807. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.82. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
9
Public perceptions of scientific advice: toward a science savvy public culture?
Public Health. 2021 May;194:86-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
10
'Shoot them dead': rhetorical constructions of the COVID-19 pandemic in Philippine presidential addresses.
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Mar;16(1):93-102. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2022.2054177. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Divisive negative discourse biases social experience: a live experiment at a massive public event.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1273. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05652-8. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
3
Political Leaders' Communication Strategies during COVID-19 in Highly Infected Countries: A Scoping Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):607. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060607.

本文引用的文献

1
Public understanding of science: Communicating in the midst of a pandemic.
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Apr;31(3):282-287. doi: 10.1177/09636625221089391.
2
An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262823. eCollection 2022.
3
What the COVID-19 pandemic reveals about science, policy and society.
Interface Focus. 2021 Oct 12;11(6):20210022. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0022. eCollection 2021 Dec 6.
4
COVID-19 vaccine mandates in Europe.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):27-28. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00776-3.
5
The EU Response to COVID-19: From Reactive Policies to Strategic Decision-Making.
J Common Mark Stud. 2021 Sep;59(Suppl 1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13259. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
The Language of Pandemic Leaderships: Mapping Political Rhetoric During the COVID-19 Outbreak.
Polit Psychol. 2021 Oct;42(5):747-766. doi: 10.1111/pops.12753. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Correction: Constructing collective identities and solidarity in premiers' early speeches on COVID-19: a global perspective.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):158. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00841-7. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
What does it mean to engage the public in the response to covid-19?
BMJ. 2021 May 26;373:n1207. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1207.
10
Politics overwhelms science in the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from the whole coverage of the Italian quality newspapers.
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0252034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252034. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验