School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 May;19(3):e12609. doi: 10.1111/opn.12609.
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a standardized international terminology to operationalize function management across multiple domains, but the summary score of the ICF qualifier scale provides limited information on the comparison of personal abilities and functioning difficulties.
To enhance the interpretative power of the ICF-based Health-oriented Personal Evaluation for the community-dwelling older person (iHOPE-OP) scale through the implementation of the item response theory (IRT) modelling.
This cross-sectional, multi-centre study administrated 161 ICF categories (58 on body functions, 15 on body structures, 60 on activities or participation and 28 on environmental factors) to evaluate the functional level of 338 older citizens (female = 158, male = 180) residing in community or supportive living facilities. The validation process encompassed assessing the IRT model fitness and evaluating the psychometric properties of the IRT-derived iHOPE-OP scale.
The age of participants ranged from 60 to 94.57, with the mean age of 70. The analysis of non-parametric and parametric models revealed that the three-parameter logistic IRT model, with a dichotomous scoring principle, exhibited the best fit. The 53-item iHOPE-OP scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.9729, Guttman's lambda-2 = 0.9749, Molenaar-Sijtsma Statistic = 0.9803, latent class reliability coefficient = 0.9882). There was a good validity between person abilities and the Barthel Index (p < .001, r = .83), as well as instrumental activities of daily living (p < .001, r = .84).
IRT methods generate the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale with the most discriminable and minimal items to represent the older person's functional performance at a comprehensive level. The use of the Wright map can aid in presby-functioning management by visualizing item difficulties and person abilities.
Considering the intricate and heterogeneous health status of older persons, a single functional assessment tool might not fulfil the need to fully understand the multifaceted health status. For use in conjunction with the IRT and ICF framework, the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale was developed and can be applied to capture presby-functioning. The Wright map depicts the distribution of item difficulties and person abilities on the same scale that facilitates person-centred goal setting and tailors intervention.
国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)提供了一个标准化的国际术语,用于在多个领域实施功能管理,但 ICF 定性尺度的综合评分提供的个人能力和功能障碍比较信息有限。
通过实施项目反应理论(IRT)模型,增强基于 ICF 的面向社区老年人的个人评估(iHOPE-OP)量表的解释能力。
这项横断面、多中心研究共评估了 338 名居住在社区或支持性生活设施中的老年人(女性=158 人,男性=180 人)的 161 个 ICF 类别(身体功能 58 个,身体结构 15 个,活动或参与 60 个,环境因素 28 个)。验证过程包括评估 IRT 模型拟合度和评估 IRT 衍生的 iHOPE-OP 量表的心理测量特性。
参与者的年龄从 60 岁到 94.57 岁,平均年龄为 70 岁。非参数和参数模型的分析表明,具有二分评分原则的三参数逻辑 IRT 模型拟合度最佳。53 项 iHOPE-OP 量表具有较高的信度(克朗巴赫 α=0.9729,Guttman 的 lambda-2=0.9749,Molenaar-Sijtsma 统计量=0.9803,潜在类别可靠性系数=0.9882)。个人能力与巴氏量表(p<0.001,r=0.83)和工具性日常生活活动(p<0.001,r=0.84)之间有很好的效度。
IRT 方法生成了可靠和有效的 iHOPE-OP 量表,具有最具区分性和最小的项目,以代表老年人的综合功能表现。使用 Wright 图可以通过可视化项目难度和个人能力来帮助老年人的功能管理。
考虑到老年人复杂和异质的健康状况,单一的功能评估工具可能无法满足全面了解老年人多方面健康状况的需要。为了与 IRT 和 ICF 框架一起使用,开发了可靠和有效的 iHOPE-OP 量表,可以用于捕捉老年人的功能。Wright 图将项目难度和个人能力的分布描绘在同一尺度上,便于以个人为中心设定目标,并根据个人能力进行干预。