Chan Jenny Yun-Chen, Linnell Lilly-Beth D, Trac Cindy, Drzewiecki Kathryn C, Ottmar Erin
Department of Early Childhood Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, No 10, Lo Ping Rd, Ting Kok, Hong Kong.
Social Science and Policy Studies, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA USA.
Educ Res Policy Pract. 2023 Feb 4:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10671-023-09333-8.
Mathematics is presented in a variety of font types across materials (e.g., textbooks, online problems); however, little is known about the effects of font type on students' mathematical performance. Undergraduate students ( = 121) completed three mathematical tasks in a one-hour online session in one of three font conditions: Times New Roman ( = 45), Kalam ( = 41), or handwriting ( = 35). We examined whether font type impacted students' performance, as measured by accuracy and response time, on the Perceptual Math Equivalence Task, error identification task, and equation-solving task. Compared to students in the Kalam and handwriting conditions, students in the Times New Roman condition were less accurate on the Perceptual Math Equivalence Task in which they judged whether two expressions were equivalent or not equivalent. We did not find differences between conditions in performance on error identification and equation-solving tasks. The findings have implications for research and practice. Specifically, researchers and educators may choose font types in which they present mathematics information with consideration, as font types may impact students' mathematical processing and performance.
在各种材料(如教科书、在线习题)中,数学内容呈现的字体类型多种多样;然而,关于字体类型对学生数学成绩的影响却知之甚少。121名本科生在一小时的在线课程中,在三种字体条件之一完成了三项数学任务:宋体(45人)、卡拉姆体(41人)或手写体(35人)。我们通过准确性和反应时间来衡量,考察了字体类型是否会影响学生在感知数学等价任务、错误识别任务和方程求解任务中的表现。与卡拉姆体和手写体条件下的学生相比,宋体条件下的学生在感知数学等价任务(判断两个表达式是否等价)中的准确性较低。我们没有发现在错误识别任务和方程求解任务的表现上,不同条件之间存在差异。这些发现对研究和实践具有启示意义。具体而言,研究人员和教育工作者在呈现数学信息时,可能需要慎重选择字体类型,因为字体类型可能会影响学生的数学处理能力和成绩。