Höhne Jan Karem, Goerres Achim
DZHW, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 23;27(2):249-254. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2023.2227011. eCollection 2024.
The measurement of political solidarities and related concepts is an important endeavor in numerous scientific disciplines, such as political and social science research. European surveys, such as the Eurobarometer, frequently measure these concepts for people's home country and Europe raising questions with respect to the order of precedence. Research has shown that the order of asking questions can have a profound impact on answer behavior compromising data quality. In this study, we therefore investigated the occurrence of question order effects in a German-European context using two questions on political solidarities. For this purpose, we conducted an experiment in a German online panel ( = 874) and analyzed response behavior and effort in terms of response times. In contrast to previous research, we found no empirical evidence for question order effects impacting people's responses. Even though there were no response time differences between the question order conditions, the first question always took longer to respond to than the remaining one. Overall, our findings indicate the robustness of questions on political solidarities against question order effects. One potential explanation is that people have comparatively strong (or crystallized) attitudes when it comes to political solidarities.
政治团结及相关概念的测量是众多科学学科中的一项重要工作,比如政治和社会科学研究。欧洲的调查,如欧洲晴雨表,经常针对人们的祖国和欧洲来测量这些概念,这就引发了关于优先顺序的问题。研究表明,提问顺序会对回答行为产生深远影响,进而损害数据质量。因此,在本研究中,我们在德国 - 欧洲背景下,使用两个关于政治团结的问题,调查了提问顺序效应的出现情况。为此,我们在一个德国在线样本(n = 874)中进行了一项实验,并从回答时间方面分析了回答行为和努力程度。与之前的研究不同,我们没有发现提问顺序效应影响人们回答的实证证据。尽管在提问顺序条件之间没有回答时间差异,但第一个问题的回答时间总是比其余问题要长。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明关于政治团结的问题对提问顺序效应具有稳健性。一个可能的解释是,人们在政治团结方面具有相对强烈(或明确)的态度。