Alzghoul Hamza, Alsakarneh Saqr, Abughazaleh Saeed, Zeineddine Lauran, Ruiz De Villa Ariel, Reddy Raju, Faruqi Ibrahim, Alzghoul Bashar
Graduate Medical Education, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida.
Internal Medicine Residency Program, North Florida Regional Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida.
ATS Sch. 2024 Jan 22;5(1):122-132. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0012OC. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Internal Medicine residents have historically expressed hesitancy in pursuing a career in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM). However, recent studies have demonstrated newfound competitiveness. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global outbreak prompted the implementation of a virtual interviewing model for PCCM fellowship match. The effect of this new paradigm on PCCM match results has not been studied previously.
With the shift to virtual interviewing, we aim to determine how this new method of interviewing may influence the selection of candidates for fellowship training programs.
We acquired data of 4,333 applicants ranking PCCM for the years 2017-2021 from the National Resident Matching Program and the Electronic Residency Application Service websites for the years 2017-2021. Chi-square (χ) analysis of the applicants' demographics and the percentage of applicants matching at their first choice versus those who matched at lower than their third-choice program before and after the implementation of virtual interviews season was performed.
The matching probability for the U.S. Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine significantly increased after the implementation of virtual interviews compared with the years 2017-2020 (χ = 8.569; = 0.003). The matching probability remained unchanged for U.S. Doctors of Medicine (χ = 2.448; = 0.118). Overall, an applicant's probability of matching at their first choice has significantly decreased after the virtual interview format (χ = 4.14; = 0.04). Conversely, the probability of matching at a program that is lower than the third choice has significantly increased (χ = 11.039; < 0.001).
Our study provides evidence regarding the effect of the virtual interview format on PCCM match results. Strikingly, applicants are more likely to match at lower-ranked programs in their rank list after the implementation of the virtual interview process. These results can be helpful for both programs and applicants, to guide their future expectations and decisions while going through the interview process.
内科住院医师历来对从事肺科和重症医学(PCCM)职业持犹豫态度。然而,最近的研究显示出了新的竞争力。冠状病毒病(COVID-19)全球大流行促使实施了PCCM专科培训匹配的虚拟面试模式。此前尚未研究这种新范式对PCCM匹配结果的影响。
随着转向虚拟面试,我们旨在确定这种新的面试方法如何影响专科培训项目候选人的选拔。
我们从国家住院医师匹配计划和电子住院医师申请服务网站获取了2017 - 2021年4333名将PCCM列为首选的申请人的数据。对虚拟面试季实施前后申请人的人口统计学特征以及在第一志愿匹配的申请人百分比与在低于第三志愿项目匹配的申请人百分比进行卡方(χ)分析。
与2017 - 2020年相比,实施虚拟面试后美国骨病医学博士的匹配概率显著增加(χ = 8.569;P = 0.003)。美国医学博士的匹配概率保持不变(χ = 2.448;P = 0.118)。总体而言,采用虚拟面试形式后,申请人在第一志愿匹配的概率显著降低(χ = 4.14;P = 0.04)。相反,在低于第三志愿的项目中匹配的概率显著增加(χ = 11.039;P < 0.001)。
我们的研究提供了关于虚拟面试形式对PCCM匹配结果影响的证据。引人注目的是,在实施虚拟面试流程后,申请人更有可能在其排名列表中较低排名的项目中匹配。这些结果对项目和申请人都有帮助,可指导他们在面试过程中的未来期望和决策。