• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院患者的“七月效应”:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。

The "July effect" on patients admitted with diabetes ketoacidosis: a national retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Francis-Morel Garry, Guevara-Rodriguez Nehemias, Portillo-Canales Shellsea, Arias Morales Carlos Ernesto, Sotello David

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Jan 29;37(3):450-457. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2307833. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2307833
PMID:38628343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11018014/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every July, new residents begin training across the United States, but it is unclear whether this affects the mortality rate of critically ill patients such as those with diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA).

METHODS

This national retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older admitted to acute care with DKA between 2016 and 2020. Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample Database. We compared patients admitted in July and August with those admitted during the remaining months and assessed the primary endpoint of all-cause inpatient mortality. We also obtained an odds ratio adjusted for confounders using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, total hospital charges, the crude rate of mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, and vasopressor requirement. Hypothesis testing was conducted using the chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's test for continuous variables. A two-tailed value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 269,095 hospitalizations identified over 5 years with a discharge diagnosis of DKA, 250,990 met the inclusion criteria. During July and August, 42,668 (17%) hospitalizations occurred, and 208,322 (83%) occurred during the remaining months. The mean age of the patients was 47 years, and there was no significant difference among the cohorts ( = 0.41). Female patients represented 54% of the total patients, and there was no difference between the cohorts ( = 0.68). Of the admitted patients, 61% were White, 21% were Black, and 11% were Hispanic, with no differences between the cohorts ( = 0.38). Medicare (35%) and Medicaid (30%) were the primary payers for most patients, and approximately 25% had private insurance. There were no differences between the cohorts in terms of primary payers ( = 0.49). The mean length of stay was 7 days, and the total hospitalization cost was $85,509. Admission in July or August did not increase the odds of inpatient mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.96,  = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with DKA, inpatient care during July and August did not increase the odds of inpatient mortality.

摘要

背景

每年7月,美国各地都会有新的住院医师开始培训,但尚不清楚这是否会影响糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)等重症患者的死亡率。

方法

这项全国性回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年至2020年间因DKA入住急症科的18岁及以上患者。数据来自全国住院患者样本数据库。我们将7月和8月入院的患者与其余月份入院的患者进行比较,并评估全因住院死亡率这一主要终点。我们还使用多因素逻辑回归分析获得了经混杂因素调整后的比值比。次要终点包括住院时间、总住院费用、机械通气的粗发生率、需要血液透析的急性肾损伤以及血管升压药的使用情况。使用卡方检验对分类变量进行假设检验,使用学生t检验对连续变量进行假设检验。双侧P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在5年期间确定的269,095例出院诊断为DKA的住院病例中,250,990例符合纳入标准。7月和8月期间发生了42,668例(17%)住院病例,其余月份发生了208,322例(83%)。患者的平均年龄为47岁,各队列之间无显著差异(P = 0.41)。女性患者占总患者的54%,各队列之间无差异(P = 0.68)。在入院患者中,61%为白人,21%为黑人,11%为西班牙裔,各队列之间无差异(P = 0.38)。医疗保险(35%)和医疗补助(30%)是大多数患者的主要支付方,约25%的患者有私人保险。各队列在主要支付方方面无差异(P = 0.49)。平均住院时间为7天,总住院费用为85,509美元。7月或8月入院并未增加住院死亡率的几率(调整后的比值比为0.96,P = 0.58)。

结论

在这项对因DKA入院患者的回顾性队列研究中,7月和8月的住院治疗并未增加住院死亡率的几率。

相似文献

1
The "July effect" on patients admitted with diabetes ketoacidosis: a national retrospective cohort study.糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院患者的“七月效应”:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Jan 29;37(3):450-457. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2307833. eCollection 2024.
2
Gender Disparities in Hypertensive Emergency Admissions: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.高血压急症入院中的性别差异:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 12;15(6):e40287. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40287. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The Impact of Cirrhosis on Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Nationwide Study.肝硬化对糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院患者预后的影响:一项全国性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 12;14(6):e25870. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25870. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Impact of diabetic ketoacidosis on outcomes in hospitalized diabetic patients with infection: a national inpatient analysis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒对住院感染糖尿病患者预后的影响:一项全国住院患者分析。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Jun 3;37(5):742-748. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2356782. eCollection 2024.
5
A retrospective study on comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis patients with and without acute pancreatitis.回顾性研究比较伴有和不伴有急性胰腺炎的糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者的临床特征和结局。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31465-3.
6
Impact of Payer Status on Hospitalization Outcomes in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis.支付方式对儿科糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院结局的影响。
S D Med. 2022 Jan;75(1):20-24.
7
CAUSES AND PREDICTORS FOR 30-DAY RE-ADMISSIONS IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS IN THE UNITED STATES: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS, 2010-2014.美国成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者 30 天再入院的原因和预测因素:2010-2014 年全国性分析。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Mar;25(3):242-253. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0457.
8
Risk Factors, Trends, and Preventive Measures for 30-Day Unplanned Diabetic Ketoacidosis Readmissions in the Pediatric Population.儿科人群30天内非计划性糖尿病酮症酸中毒再入院的危险因素、趋势及预防措施
Cureus. 2021 Nov 2;13(11):e19205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19205. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Health Care Utilization and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the U.S. Over the Past Decade: A Nationwide Analysis.过去十年美国的医疗保健利用与糖尿病酮症酸中毒负担:一项全国性分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1631-1638. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1379. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Comparing outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalisations in patients with diastolic heart failure: A retrospective propensity matched analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.舒张性心力衰竭患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院治疗结果的比较:基于全国住院患者样本的回顾性倾向匹配分析
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Oct;37(7):e3435. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3435. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetic ketoacidosis outcomes and the "July effect".糖尿病酮症酸中毒的结局与“七月效应”。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Mar 7;37(3):458. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2324652. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
No "July Effect" in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction: An 18-year United States national study.急性心肌梗死的管理与预后不存在“七月效应”:一项为期18年的美国全国性研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30553.
2
Does the "July effect" of new trainees at teaching hospitals impact outcomes for patients hospitalized with heart failure? Real-world analyses of more than half a million US admissions.教学医院新实习生的“七月效应”是否会影响心力衰竭住院患者的治疗结果?对超过50万例美国住院病例的真实世界分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Jan;13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100072. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
3
Influence of Admission Time on Health Care Quality and Utilization in Patients with Stroke: Analysis for a Possible July Effect and Weekend Effect.入院时间对卒中患者医疗质量和医疗服务利用的影响:对可能存在的七月效应和周末效应的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;18(23):12362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312362.
4
Rates of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients After Summer-Time Resident Changeover in the United States: Is There a July Effect?美国夏令时住院医师换班后患者不良事件发生率:是否存在“七月效应”?
J Patient Saf. 2022 Apr 1;18(3):253-259. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000887.
5
July Effect on Mortality and Complications in Patients With ARDS in US Teaching Hospitals.美国教学医院中急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率及并发症的“七月效应”
Am J Crit Care. 2021 Jul 1;30(4):e64-e70. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021608.
6
Reassessing the July Effect: 30 Years of Evidence Show No Difference in Outcomes.重新评估“七月效应”:30 年的证据表明,结果并无差异。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e204-e211. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004805. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
7
Impact of Charlson Co-Morbidity Index Score on Management and Outcomes After Acute Coronary Syndrome.Charlson 共病指数评分对急性冠状动脉综合征管理和结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Isolated or Combined Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State: A Retrospective, Hospital-Based Cohort Study.单纯糖尿病酮症酸中毒与高血糖高渗综合征患者的临床结局:一项回顾性基于医院的队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):349-357. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1168. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Trends in Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hospitalizations and In-Hospital Mortality - United States, 2000-2014.2000 - 2014年美国糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院治疗趋势及院内死亡率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Mar 30;67(12):362-365. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6712a3.
10
Mortality among high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to U.S. teaching-intensive hospitals in July: a retrospective observational study.美国教学医院收治的高危急性心肌梗死患者的死亡率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Circulation. 2013 Dec 24;128(25):2754-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004074. Epub 2013 Oct 23.