Suppr超能文献

沃克替尼在四联疗法根除治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项比较研究。

The efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in quadruple therapy for eradication: a comparative study.

作者信息

Zhuang Xiaoduan, Jiang Huiyue, Jin Dandan, Sun Meiling, Wang Zhenwu, Wang Xinying

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024 Apr 15;12:goae036. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goae036. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and optimal dose of the new acid-suppressant vonoprazan (VPZ) for quadruple therapy remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 20 mg VPZ daily (VOD) and 20 mg VPZ twice daily (VTD) with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) twice daily in quadruple therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 954 patients treated with quadruple therapy to eradicate . Eradication rates and adverse events were compared between the VOD and VTD groups, and between the VOD and PPI groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify the predictors of eradication failure.

RESULTS

Eradication was successful in 875 (91.7%) of the 954 patients. The total, initial, and rescue eradication rates in the VOD group were 92.1%, 93.3%, and 77.8%, respectively. In both the crude and multivariate analyses, the VOD group showed eradication rates comparable to those of the VTD and PPI groups (all >0.05). Age > 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.165, =0.012) and use of rescue therapy (OR = 3.496, <0.001) were independent risk factors for eradication failure, whereas VPZ at a low dosing frequency of 20 mg daily was not. A total of 787 patients (82.5%) were followed up (mean follow-up time, 6.7 ± 2.0 months). Compared with the VOD group, the VTD group was more likely to experience adverse events (OR = 2.073, =0.035).

CONCLUSION

VPZ at a low dose of 20 mg daily is an effective and safe component of the quadruple therapy for eradication.

摘要

背景

新型抑酸剂沃克(VPZ)用于四联疗法的疗效及最佳剂量仍不确定。本研究旨在比较每日20mg沃克(VOD)、每日两次20mg沃克(VTD)与每日两次质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在四联疗法中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了954例接受四联疗法根除[此处原文缺失具体病原体]的患者数据。比较了VOD组和VTD组之间以及VOD组和PPI组之间的根除率和不良事件。进行多因素分析以确定根除失败的预测因素。

结果

954例患者中有875例(91.7%)根除成功。VOD组的总体、初始和补救根除率分别为92.1%、93.3%和77.8%。在粗分析和多因素分析中,VOD组的根除率与VTD组和PPI组相当(均>0.05)。年龄>60岁(比值比[OR]=2.165,P=0.012)和使用补救疗法(OR=3.496,P<0.001)是根除失败的独立危险因素,而每日20mg低剂量频率的VPZ不是。共有787例患者(82.5%)接受了随访(平均随访时间为6.7±2.0个月)。与VOD组相比,VTD组更易发生不良事件(OR=2.073,P=0.035)。

结论

每日20mg低剂量的VPZ是根除[此处原文缺失具体病原体]四联疗法的有效且安全的组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cea6/11018536/1112a91939d6/goae036f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验