Boutin Melina, Krishnan Tharani, Safro Maria, Yang Jenny, Jafari Helia, Davies Janine M, Gill Sharlene
BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BC Cancer, 600 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z4E6.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;16:17588359241247008. doi: 10.1177/17588359241247008. eCollection 2024.
Complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (CC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, this is not always feasible, and recurrence rates remain high.
To understand the real-world proportions and reason for treatment failure in resected biliary tract cancers.
We performed a retrospective population-based review of patients with GBC or CC [intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC)] resected between 2005 and 2019 using the BC Cancer provincial database. A chart review was conducted to characterize demographics, treatments received and outcomes.
In total, 594 patients were identified of whom 416 (70%) had disease recurrence. Most GBCs (96%) were diagnosed incidentally, and repeat oncologic resection was performed in 45%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received in 51% of patients diagnosed after 2017 (mostly capecitabine). Patient co-morbidities, disease progression and patient preference were the commonest reasons for not proceeding with adjuvant chemotherapy. One-third of patients did not complete all planned cycles. Median overall survival was significantly higher in those with complete (R0) incomplete (R1) resection [31.6 18 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.53] and in those with without re-resection for GBC [29.4 19 months, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73]. There was a trend towards improved survival with without adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02). Only 25% in the more contemporary cohort (2017-2019) had an R0 resection and completed adjuvant chemotherapy.
Complete resection, including reresection for incidentally diagnosed GBCs, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved outcomes in this retrospective cohort, yet many patients were not able to complete these treatments. Neoadjuvant strategies may improve treatment delivery and ultimately, outcomes.
对于局限性胆管癌(CC)或胆囊癌(GBC)患者,完整切除后辅助化疗是金标准。然而,这并非总是可行的,且复发率仍然很高。
了解接受手术切除的胆管癌患者治疗失败的实际比例及原因。
我们使用卑诗省癌症数据库,对2005年至2019年间接受手术切除的GBC或CC(肝内胆管癌[IHCC]或肝外胆管癌[EHCC])患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性研究。通过查阅病历以描述患者的人口统计学特征、接受的治疗及预后情况。
共识别出594例患者,其中416例(70%)出现疾病复发。大多数GBC(96%)为偶然诊断,45%的患者接受了再次肿瘤切除。2017年后诊断的患者中,51%接受了辅助化疗(大多为卡培他滨)。患者合并症、疾病进展及患者偏好是未进行辅助化疗的最常见原因。三分之一的患者未完成所有计划疗程。完整(R0)切除与不完整(R1)切除患者的中位总生存期有显著差异[31.6个月对18个月,风险比(HR):0.43,95%置信区间(CI):0.35 - 0.53],GBC患者接受再次切除与未接受再次切除的患者中位总生存期也有显著差异[29.4个月对19个月,HR:0.55,95%CI:0.41 - 0.73]。接受辅助治疗与未接受辅助治疗的患者生存情况有改善趋势(HR:0.79,95%CI:0.61 - 1.02)。在更近期的队列(2017 - 2019年)中,只有25%的患者实现了R0切除并完成了辅助化疗。
在这个回顾性队列中,完整切除(包括对偶然诊断的GBC进行再次切除)及辅助化疗与改善预后相关,但许多患者无法完成这些治疗。新辅助治疗策略可能会改善治疗实施情况并最终改善预后。