Anderson George M, Cook Edwin H, Blakely Randy D, Sutcliffe James S, Veenstra-VanderWeele Jeremy
Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Apr 11;17:2169-2172. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S456000. eCollection 2024.
We believe there are serious problems with a recently published and highly publicized paper entitled "Serotonin reduction in post-acute sequelae of viral infection." The blood centrifugation procedure reportedly used by Wong et al would produce plasma that is substantially (over 95%) depleted of platelets. Given this, their published mean plasma serotonin values of 1.2 uM and 2.4 uM for the control/contrast groups appear to be at least 30 to 60 times too high and should be disregarded. The plasma serotonin values reported for the long COVID and viremia patients also should be disregarded, as should any comparisons to the control/contrast groups. We also note that the plasma serotonin means for the two control/contrast groups are not in good agreement. In the "Discussion" section, Wong et al state that their results tend to support the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of COVID-19, and they encourage further clinical trials of SSRIs. While they state that, "Our animal models demonstrate that serotonin levels can be restored and memory impairment reversed by precursor supplementation or SSRI treatment", it should be noted that no data are presented showing an increase or restoration in circulating serotonin with SSRI administration. In fact, one would expect a marked decline in platelet serotonin due to SSRIs' effective inhibition of the platelet serotonin transporter. Wong et al hypothesize that problems of long COVID arise from too little peripheral serotonin. However, given the frequent presence of a hyperaggregation state in long COVID, and the known augmenting effects of platelet serotonin on platelet aggregation, it is plausible to suggest that reductions in platelet serotonin might be associated with a lessening of the cardiovascular sequelae of COVID-19.
我们认为,最近发表且备受关注的一篇题为《病毒感染后急性后遗症中血清素的减少》的论文存在严重问题。据报道,Wong等人使用的血液离心程序会产生血小板大量(超过95%)耗尽的血浆。鉴于此,他们公布的对照组/对比组血浆血清素平均浓度值1.2微摩尔/升和2.4微摩尔/升似乎至少高估了30至60倍,不应予以采信。对于长期新冠患者和病毒血症患者报告的血浆血清素值,以及与对照组/对比组的任何比较,也都不应予以采信。我们还注意到,两个对照组/对比组的血浆血清素平均值并不一致。在“讨论”部分,Wong等人表示,他们的结果倾向于支持使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)来治疗新冠,并且鼓励对SSRI进行进一步的临床试验。虽然他们称,“我们的动物模型表明,通过补充前体物质或使用SSRI治疗,可以恢复血清素水平并逆转记忆障碍”,但应当指出的是,文中并未给出数据表明使用SSRI后循环血清素会增加或恢复。事实上,由于SSRI对血小板血清素转运体的有效抑制作用,人们预期血小板血清素会显著下降。Wong等人推测,长期新冠的问题源于外周血清素过少。然而,鉴于长期新冠患者中经常存在高聚集状态,以及已知血小板血清素对血小板聚集的增强作用,有理由认为血小板血清素的减少可能与新冠心血管后遗症的减轻有关。