Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jun;20(6):3827-3838. doi: 10.1002/alz.13803. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
In trials of amyloid-lowering drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD), differential eligibility may contribute to under-inclusion of racial and ethnic underrepresented groups. We examined plasma amyloid beta 42/40 and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid eligibility for the ongoing AHEAD Study preclinical AD program (NCT04468659).
Univariate logistic regression models were used to examine group differences in plasma and PET amyloid screening eligibility.
Of 4905 participants screened at time of analysis, 1724 were plasma eligible to continue in screening: 13.3% Hispanic Black, 24.7% Hispanic White, 20.8% non-Hispanic (NH) Asian, 24.7% NH Black, and 38.9% NH White. Plasma eligibility differed across groups in models controlling for covariates (odds ratio from 1.9 to 4.0 compared to the NH White reference group, P < 0.001). Among plasma eligible participants, PET eligibility did not differ by group.
These results suggest that prevalence of brain amyloid pathology differed, but that eligibility based on plasma was equally effective across racial and ethnic group members.
Plasma amyloid eligibility is lower in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. In plasma eligible adults, positron emission tomography eligibility rates are similar across race and ethnicity. Plasma biomarker tests may be similarly effective across racial and ethnic groups.
在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的淀粉样蛋白降低药物试验中,不同的入选标准可能导致代表性不足的少数族裔和族裔人群的入选不足。我们检查了正在进行的 AHEAD 研究临床前 AD 计划(NCT04468659)中用于淀粉样蛋白的血浆β42/40 和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。
使用单变量逻辑回归模型来检查血浆和 PET 淀粉样蛋白筛选入选标准的组间差异。
在分析时筛选的 4905 名参与者中,有 1724 名符合继续进行筛选的血浆标准:13.3%西班牙裔黑人,24.7%西班牙裔白人,20.8%非西班牙裔(NH)亚洲人,24.7%NH 黑人,和 38.9%NH 白人。在控制协变量的模型中,各组之间的血浆入选标准存在差异(与 NH 白人参考组相比,比值比为 1.9 至 4.0,P<0.001)。在血浆符合入选标准的参与者中,PET 入选标准不因组而异。
这些结果表明,脑淀粉样蛋白病理的患病率存在差异,但基于血浆的入选标准在不同种族和族裔群体成员中同样有效。
在代表性不足的少数族裔和族裔群体中,血浆淀粉样蛋白入选标准较低。在符合血浆入选标准的成年人中,正电子发射断层扫描入选率在种族和族裔之间相似。血浆生物标志物测试可能在不同的种族和族裔群体中同样有效。