• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

温带针叶树茎生长和冠层绿色对干旱期的响应。

Responses of stem growth and canopy greenness of temperate conifers to dry spells.

机构信息

Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic.

Dpto. de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Aug;68(8):1533-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02682-w. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00484-024-02682-w
PMID:38630139
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281975/
Abstract

Dry spells strongly influence biomass production in forest ecosystems. Their effects may last several years following a drought event, prolonging growth reduction and therefore restricting carbon sequestration. Yet, our understanding of the impact of dry spells on the vitality of trees' above-ground biomass components (e.g., stems and leaves) at a landscape level remains limited. We analyzed the responses of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies to the four most severe drought years in topographically complex sites. To represent stem growth and canopy greenness, we used chronologies of tree-ring width and time series of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). We analyzed the responses of radial tree growth and NDVI to dry spells using superposed epoch analysis and further explored this relationship using mixed-effect models. Our results show a stronger and more persistent response of radial growth to dry spells and faster recovery of canopy greenness. Canopy greenness started to recover the year after the dry spell, whereas radial tree growth remained reduced for the two subsequent years and did not recover the pre-drought level until the fourth year after the event. Stem growth and canopy greenness were influenced by climatic conditions during and after drought events, while the effect of topography was marginal. The opposite responses of stem growth and canopy greenness following drought events suggest a different impact of dry spells on trees´ sink and source compartments. These results underscore the crucial importance of understanding the complexities of tree growth as a major sink of atmospheric carbon.

摘要

干旱期强烈影响森林生态系统的生物量生产。在干旱事件发生后的几年内,其影响可能会持续存在,延长生长减少,从而限制碳封存。然而,我们对干旱期对树木地上生物量组成部分(例如,茎和叶)活力的影响在景观水平上的理解仍然有限。我们分析了在地形复杂的地点,欧洲赤松和欧洲云杉对四个最严重干旱年份的响应。为了代表茎生长和冠层绿色度,我们使用树木年轮宽度时间序列和归一化差异植被指数 (NDVI) 的时间序列。我们使用叠加期分析来分析径向树木生长和 NDVI 对干旱期的响应,并使用混合效应模型进一步探讨这种关系。我们的结果表明,径向生长对干旱期的响应更强且更持久,冠层绿色度的恢复更快。冠层绿色度在干旱期后的一年开始恢复,而径向树木生长在随后的两年内仍然减少,直到事件发生后的第四年才恢复到干旱前的水平。茎生长和冠层绿色度受干旱事件期间和之后的气候条件影响,而地形的影响则微不足道。干旱事件后茎生长和冠层绿色度的相反响应表明干旱期对树木的汇和源区有不同的影响。这些结果强调了理解树木生长作为大气碳主要汇的复杂性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/0dedbc572c37/484_2024_2682_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/03a898f52af2/484_2024_2682_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/935e7727b014/484_2024_2682_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/0dedbc572c37/484_2024_2682_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/03a898f52af2/484_2024_2682_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/935e7727b014/484_2024_2682_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c8b/11281975/0dedbc572c37/484_2024_2682_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Responses of stem growth and canopy greenness of temperate conifers to dry spells.温带针叶树茎生长和冠层绿色对干旱期的响应。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Aug;68(8):1533-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02682-w. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
Shifting climatic responses of tree rings and NDVI along environmental gradients.树木年轮和 NDVI 沿环境梯度的气候响应变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168275. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Trends in climatically driven extreme growth reductions of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Central Europe.气候变化导致的欧洲中部云杉和欧洲赤松极端生长减少的趋势。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jan;28(2):557-570. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15922. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
4
Declines in canopy greenness and tree growth are caused by combined climate extremes during drought-induced dieback.树冠变绿和树木生长减少是由干旱导致树木枯萎期间气候极端事件综合作用造成的。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 20;813:152666. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152666. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode.干旱事件发生 4 年后,碳储量和树冠凋落物决定了苏格兰松的恢复。
New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):750-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03628.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
6
Diverging growth trends and climate sensitivities of individual pine trees after the 1976 extreme drought.1976 年极端干旱后,个别松树的生长趋势和气候敏感性出现分歧。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 10;946:174370. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174370. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Rhizosphere activity in an old-growth forest reacts rapidly to changes in soil moisture and shapes whole-tree carbon allocation.在原始森林中,根际活性对土壤水分的变化反应迅速,并影响整棵树的碳分配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 6;117(40):24885-24892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014084117. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Interactions of thinning and stem height on the drought response of radial stem growth and isotopic composition of Norway spruce (Picea abies).变密度与树高对挪威云杉径向茎生长和稳定同位素组成干旱响应的交互作用。
Tree Physiol. 2012 Oct;32(10):1199-213. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps077. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
Linking drought legacy effects across scales: From leaves to tree rings to ecosystems.链接跨尺度的干旱遗留效应:从叶片到树轮再到生态系统。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Sep;25(9):2978-2992. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14710. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
10
Amazon drought and forest response: Largely reduced forest photosynthesis but slightly increased canopy greenness during the extreme drought of 2015/2016.亚马逊干旱与森林响应:2015/2016 年极端干旱期间,森林光合作用大幅下降,但冠层绿色度略有增加。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):1919-1934. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14056. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrient regime modulates drought response patterns of three temperate tree species.养分状况调节三种温带树种的干旱响应模式。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 10;868:161601. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161601. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
Strategies of tree species to adapt to drought from leaf stomatal regulation and stem embolism resistance to root properties.树种从叶片气孔调节、茎干抗栓塞到根系特性来适应干旱的策略。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 27;13:926535. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.926535. eCollection 2022.
3
What drives forest carbon storage? The ramifications of source-sink decoupling.
是什么驱动了森林碳储存?源汇解耦的影响。
New Phytol. 2022 Oct;236(1):5-8. doi: 10.1111/nph.18415. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
4
Warm springs alter timing but not total growth of temperate deciduous trees.暖泉改变了温带落叶树的时间安排,但没有改变其总生长量。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7923):552-557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05092-3. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Non-growing season drought legacy effects on vegetation growth in southwestern China.非生长季干旱对中国西南地区植被生长的滞后影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157334. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157334. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Drought impacts on tree carbon sequestration and water use - evidence from intra-annual tree-ring characteristics.干旱对树木碳固存和水分利用的影响——来自年轮年内特征的证据。
New Phytol. 2022 Oct;236(1):58-70. doi: 10.1111/nph.18224. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Cross-biome synthesis of source versus sink limits to tree growth.跨生态系统综合分析树木生长的源与库限制。
Science. 2022 May 13;376(6594):758-761. doi: 10.1126/science.abm4875. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Jet stream position explains regional anomalies in European beech forest productivity and tree growth.急流位置解释了欧洲山毛榉森林生产力和树木生长的区域异常。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 19;13(1):2015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29615-8.
9
Linking the growth patterns of coniferous species with their performance under climate aridization.将针叶树种的生长模式与其在气候干旱化下的表现联系起来。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 20;831:154971. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154971. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Satellite data reveal differential responses of Swiss forests to unprecedented 2018 drought.卫星数据揭示了瑞士森林对 2018 年史无前例干旱的不同响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 May;28(9):2956-2978. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16136. Epub 2022 Mar 7.