• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫星数据揭示了瑞士森林对 2018 年史无前例干旱的不同响应。

Satellite data reveal differential responses of Swiss forests to unprecedented 2018 drought.

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2022 May;28(9):2956-2978. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16136. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.16136
PMID:35182091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9310759/
Abstract

Extreme events such as the summer drought of 2018 in Central Europe are projected to occur more frequently in the future and may cause major damages including increased tree mortality and negative impacts on forest ecosystem services. Here, we quantify the response of >1 million forest pixels of 10 × 10 m across Switzerland to the 2018 drought in terms of resistance, recovery, and resilience. We used the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) derived from Sentinel-2 satellite data as a proxy for canopy water content and analyzed its relative change. We calculated NDWI change between the 2017 pre-drought and 2018 drought years (indicating resistance), 2018 and the 2019 post-drought (indicating recovery), and between 2017-2019 (indicating resilience). Analyzing the data from this large natural experiment, we found that for 4.3% of the Swiss forest the NDWI declined between 2017 and 2018, indicating areas with low resistance of the forest canopy to drought effects. While roughly 50% of this area recovered, in 2.7% of the forested area NDWI continued to decline from 2018 to 2019, suggesting prolonged negative effects or delayed damage. We found differential forest responses to drought associated with site topographic characteristics and forest stand characteristics, and to a lesser extent with climatic conditions and interactions between these drivers. Low drought resistance and high recovery were most prominent at forest edges, but also on south-facing slopes and lower elevations. Tree functional type was the most important driver of drought resilience, with most of the damage in stands with high conifer abundance. Our results demonstrate the suitability of satellite-based quantification of drought-induced forest damage at high spatial resolution across large areas. Such information is important to predict how local site characteristics may impact forest vulnerability to future extreme events and help in the search for appropriate adaptation strategies.

摘要

极端事件,如 2018 年中欧夏季干旱,预计未来将更频繁地发生,并可能造成重大损失,包括增加树木死亡率和对森林生态系统服务的负面影响。在这里,我们根据抵抗能力、恢复能力和弹性,量化了瑞士超过 100 万个 10×10 米森林像素对 2018 年干旱的响应。我们使用 Sentinel-2 卫星数据衍生的归一化差异水指数(NDWI)作为冠层含水量的代理,并分析了其相对变化。我们计算了 2017 年干旱前和 2018 年干旱年(表示抵抗能力)之间、2018 年和 2019 年干旱后(表示恢复能力)之间以及 2017-2019 年之间(表示弹性)的 NDWI 变化。通过对这个大型自然实验的数据进行分析,我们发现瑞士森林中 4.3%的 NDWI 在 2017 年至 2018 年期间下降,这表明森林冠层对干旱影响的抵抗能力较低。虽然大约 50%的地区得到了恢复,但在 2.7%的森林地区,NDWI 从 2018 年继续下降到 2019 年,这表明持续存在负面影响或延迟的损害。我们发现,森林对干旱的反应因地形特征、森林林分特征以及气候条件和这些驱动因素之间的相互作用而有所不同。干旱抵抗力低和恢复能力高的地区最突出的是森林边缘,但也在朝南的斜坡和较低的海拔地区。树木功能类型是干旱恢复能力的最重要驱动因素,高针叶树丰度的林分中受损害最大。我们的研究结果表明,基于卫星的高空间分辨率和大面积干旱引起的森林损害量化是合适的。这种信息对于预测局部地点特征如何影响森林对未来极端事件的脆弱性以及帮助寻找适当的适应策略非常重要。

相似文献

1
Satellite data reveal differential responses of Swiss forests to unprecedented 2018 drought.卫星数据揭示了瑞士森林对 2018 年史无前例干旱的不同响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 May;28(9):2956-2978. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16136. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Riparian forest response to extreme drought is influenced by climatic context and canopy structure.河岸林对极端干旱的响应受气候背景和冠层结构的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 10;881:163128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163128. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
3
Short-term forest resilience after drought-induced die-off in Southwestern European forests.欧洲西南部森林干旱致死后的短期森林恢复力
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 4):150940. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150940. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Drought conditions, aridity and forest structure control the responses of Iberian holm oak woodlands to extreme droughts: A large-scale remote-sensing exploration in eastern Spain.干旱条件、干旱和森林结构控制伊比利亚油松林对极端干旱的响应:西班牙东部的大规模遥感探测。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 25;901:165887. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165887. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Photosynthetic and hydraulic traits influence forest resistance and resilience to drought stress across different biomes.光合作用和水力特性影响不同生物群落中森林对干旱胁迫的抵抗力和恢复力。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 1;828:154517. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154517. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Growth resistance and resilience of mixed silver fir and Norway spruce forests in central Europe: Contrasting responses to mild and severe droughts.中欧混交银冷杉和挪威云杉林的生长阻力和恢复力:对轻度和重度干旱的对比响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Sep;27(18):4403-4419. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15737. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Impacts of Water Stress on Forest Recovery and Its Interaction with Canopy Height.水分胁迫对森林恢复的影响及其与冠层高度的相互作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 13;15(6):1257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061257.
8
The impact of drought spells on forests depends on site conditions: The case of 2017 summer heat wave in southern Europe.干旱对森林的影响取决于地点条件:以 2017 年夏季南欧热浪为例。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb;26(2):851-863. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14825. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Tree resistance and recovery from drought mediated by multiple abiotic and biotic processes across a large geographic gradient.树木在大范围地理梯度上通过多种非生物和生物过程来抵抗和从干旱中恢复。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147744. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147744. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Large-scale early-wilting response of Central European forests to the 2018 extreme drought.中欧森林对 2018 年极端干旱的大规模早期萎蔫响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Dec;26(12):7021-7035. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15360. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Spectral biology across scales in changing environments.变化环境中跨尺度的光谱生物学。
Ecology. 2025 Jul;106(7):e70078. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70078.
2
Satellite Observations Reveal a Positive Relationship Between Trait-Based Diversity and Drought Response in Temperate Forests.卫星观测揭示了温带森林中基于性状的多样性与干旱响应之间的正相关关系。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Feb;31(2):e70059. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70059.
3
Responses of stem growth and canopy greenness of temperate conifers to dry spells.温带针叶树茎生长和冠层绿色对干旱期的响应。

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid hydraulic collapse as cause of drought-induced mortality in conifers.快速水力衰竭是针叶树干旱致死的原因
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025251118.
2
Simulating forest resilience: A review.模拟森林恢复力:综述
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2020 Dec;29(12):2082-2096. doi: 10.1111/geb.13197. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe.过量的森林死亡与欧洲各地的干旱密切相关。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Aug;68(8):1533-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02682-w. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
European beech dieback after premature leaf senescence during the 2018 drought in northern Switzerland.2018 年瑞士北部干旱期间提前叶片衰老导致欧洲山毛榉枯萎病。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2022 Dec;24(7):1132-1145. doi: 10.1111/plb.13467. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
5
Soil-plant interactions modulated water availability of Swiss forests during the 2015 and 2018 droughts.土壤-植物相互作用调节了瑞士森林在 2015 年和 2018 年干旱期间的水分可用性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Oct;28(20):5928-5944. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16332. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
6
Radial Growth of Trees Rather Than Shrubs in Boreal Forests Is Inhibited by Drought.北方森林中树木而非灌木的径向生长受到干旱抑制。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 2;13:912916. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.912916. eCollection 2022.
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 3;11(1):6200. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19924-1.
4
Large-scale early-wilting response of Central European forests to the 2018 extreme drought.中欧森林对 2018 年极端干旱的大规模早期萎蔫响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Dec;26(12):7021-7035. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15360. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Physiological response of Swiss ecosystems to 2018 drought across plant types and elevation.瑞士生态系统对 2018 年干旱的生理响应:跨越植物类型和海拔。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 26;375(1810):20190521. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0521. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity.2018年热浪和干旱对欧洲生态系统生产力的直接和季节性遗留影响。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 10;6(24):eaba2724. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba2724. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Ghosts of the past: how drought legacy effects shape forest functioning and carbon cycling.过去的幽灵:干旱遗留效应对森林功能和碳循环的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2020 May;23(5):891-901. doi: 10.1111/ele.13485. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
8
Shared drought responses among conifer species in the middle Siberian taiga are uncoupled from their contrasting water-use efficiency trajectories.在西伯利亚中泰加地区,针叶树种之间存在着共享的干旱响应,但与它们截然不同的水分利用效率轨迹无关。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 10;720:137590. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137590. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
A catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species.灾难性的热带干旱会杀死对水力脆弱的树种。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):3122-3133. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15037. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
10
Remote sensing of forest gas exchange: Considerations derived from a tomographic perspective.森林气体交换的遥感:从断层扫描角度得出的思考。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Apr;26(4):2717-2727. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15007. Epub 2020 Feb 8.