Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box SURG, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, 8915 W. Connell Ct., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jul;59(7):1378-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.033. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
Neighborhood and built environment encompass one key area of the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) and is frequently assessed using area-level indices.
We sought to systematically review the pediatric surgery literature for use of commonly applied area-level indices and to compare their utility for prediction of outcomes.
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, PsycInfo, and an artificial intelligence search tool (1/2013-2/2023).
Inclusion required pediatric surgical patients in the US, surgical intervention performed, and use of an area-level metric.
Extraction domains included study, patient, and procedure characteristics.
Area Deprivation Index is the most consistent and commonly accepted index. It is also the most granular, as it uses Census Block Groups. Child Opportunity Index is less granular (Census Tract), but incorporates pediatric-specific predictors of risk. Results with Social Vulnerability Index, Neighborhood Deprivation Index, and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status were less consistent.
All studies were retrospective and quality varied from good to fair.
While each index has strengths and limitations, standardization on ideal metric(s) for the pediatric surgical population will help build the inferential power needed to move from understanding the role of SDOH to building meaningful interventions towards equity in care.
Systematic Review.
Level III.
邻里和建筑环境包含健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的一个关键领域,并且经常使用区域水平指数进行评估。
我们旨在系统地审查小儿外科学文献中常用的区域水平指数的使用情况,并比较它们在预测结果方面的效用。
使用 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print、PsycInfo 和人工智能搜索工具(2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月)进行文献检索。
纳入标准为美国的小儿外科患者、进行的手术干预以及使用区域水平指标。
提取的领域包括研究、患者和手术特征。
区域贫困指数是最一致和最常被接受的指数。它也是最细粒度的,因为它使用了人口普查街区组。儿童机会指数的粒度较小(人口普查区),但包含了儿科特定的风险预测因素。社会脆弱性指数、邻里贫困指数和邻里社会经济地位的结果不太一致。
所有研究均为回顾性研究,质量从良好到一般不等。
虽然每个指数都有其优势和局限性,但针对小儿外科学人群的理想指标进行标准化将有助于建立必要的推理能力,从了解 SDOH 的作用到构建有意义的干预措施,以实现护理公平。
系统评价。
三级。