Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Center for Healthy Longevity, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59571-w.
There is a lack of studies that concurrently differentiate the effect of the holiday season from the weekend effect on mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the mortality risk among patients admitted with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult AMI patients admitted during January and February between 2013 and 2020 were enrolled and classified into the holiday season (using the Chinese New Year holiday seasons as an indicator) (n = 1729), weekend (n = 4725), and weekday (n = 14,583) groups according to the first day of admission. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the risk. With the weekday group or the weekend group as the reference, the holiday season group did not have increased risks of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.15; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.93-1.42 or aOR 1.23; 95% CI 0.96-1.56) and 7-day mortality (aOR 1.20; 95% CI 0.90-1.58 or aOR 1.24; 95% CI 0.90-1.70). Stratified and subgroup analyses showed similar trends. We conclude that holiday season-initiated admissions were not associated with higher mortality risks in AMI admission cases than weekday or weekend admissions.
在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中,同时区分假期效应和周末效应对死亡率风险的影响的研究较少。我们使用来自台湾全民健康保险研究数据库的数据,评估了接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 AMI 入院患者的死亡率风险。纳入了 2013 年至 2020 年 1 月至 2 月期间因 AMI 入院的成年患者,并根据入院的第一天将其分为假期季节组(使用中国新年假期作为指标)(n=1729)、周末组(n=4725)和工作日组(n=14583)。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估风险。以工作日组或周末组为参考,假期季节组的院内死亡率(调整比值比[aOR]1.15;95%置信区间[CI]0.93-1.42或 aOR 1.23;95% CI 0.96-1.56)和 7 天死亡率(aOR 1.20;95% CI 0.90-1.58 或 aOR 1.24;95% CI 0.90-1.70)均无增加风险。分层和亚组分析显示出相似的趋势。我们的结论是,与工作日或周末入院相比,假期季节开始入院与 AMI 入院病例的死亡率风险增加无关。