Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No.25, Lane 442, Sec. 1, Jingguo Rd., Hsinchu, 30059, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25415-8.
Weekend effect has been considered to be associated with poorer quality of care and patient's survival. For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, the question of whether patients admitted during off-hours have worse outcomes as compared with patients admitted during on-hours is still inconclusive. We conducted this study to explore the weekend effect in AMI patients, using a nationwide insurance database in Taiwan. Using Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database, we designed a retrospective cohort study, and extracted 184,769 incident cases of AMI through the NHI claims database between January 2006 and December 2014. We divided the patients into weekend admission group and weekday admission group. Patients were stratified as ST elevation/non-ST elevation AMI and receiving/not receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a logistic regression model to examine the relative risk of in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality which were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry between study groups. We found no difference between weekend group and weekday group for risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 16.2%, standardized difference 0.0118) and risk of 1-year mortality (30.2% vs 30.9%, standardized difference 0.0164). There was no statistically significant difference among all the comparisons through the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for all the covariates and stratifying by the subtypes of AMI and whether or not executing PCI during hospitalization. As for AMI patients in Taiwan, admission on weekends or weekdays did not have a significant impact on either in-hospital mortality or 1-year cumulative mortality.
周末效应被认为与较差的医疗质量和患者生存有关。对于急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者,在非工作时间入院的患者与在工作时间入院的患者相比,结局是否更差,这一问题仍无定论。我们使用台湾全民健康保险数据库进行了这项研究,以探讨 AMI 患者的周末效应。
我们使用台湾全民健康保险(NHI)理赔数据库进行回顾性队列研究,通过 NHI 理赔数据库在 2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间提取了 184769 例 AMI 新发病例。我们将患者分为周末入院组和工作日入院组。患者被分为 ST 段抬高型/非 ST 段抬高型 AMI 和接受/未接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。我们使用逻辑回归模型来比较两组患者住院期间死亡率和 1 年死亡率。
我们从台湾国家死亡登记处获得的住院期间死亡率和 1 年死亡率的相对风险,我们发现周末组和工作日组之间的住院期间死亡率(15.8% vs 16.2%,标准化差异 0.0118)和 1 年死亡率(30.2% vs 30.9%,标准化差异 0.0164)差异无统计学意义。在校正所有协变量和按 AMI 亚型和住院期间是否执行 PCI 分层后,通过多变量逻辑回归分析比较所有组间,差异均无统计学意义。
对于台湾的 AMI 患者,周末或工作日入院对住院期间死亡率或 1 年累积死亡率均无显著影响。