Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xinquan Road, Gulou District, 351001, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Siming District, 361005, Xiamen, China.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12193-x.
Patients-derived xenograft (PDX) model have been widely used for tumor biological and pathological studies. However, the metabolic similarity of PDX tumor to the primary cancer (PC) is still unknown.
In present study, we established PDX model by engrafting primary tumor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and then compared the tumor metabolomics of PC, the first generation of PDX tumor (PDXG1), and the third generation of PDX tumor (PDXG3) by using H NMR spectroscopy. Then, we assessed the differences in response to chemotherapy between PDXG1 and PDXG3 and corresponding metabolomic differences in drug-resistant tumor tissues. To evaluate the metabolomic similarity of PDX to PC, we also compared the metabolomic difference of cell-derived xenograft (CDX) vs. PC and PDX vs. PC.
After engraftment, PDXG1 tumor had a low level of lactate, pyruvate, citrate and multiple amino acids (AAs) compared with PC. Metabolite sets enrichment and metabolic pathway analyses implied that glycolysis metabolisms were suppressed in PDXG1 tumor, and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA)-associated anaplerosis pathways, such as amino acids metabolisms, were enhanced. Then, after multiple passages of PDX, the altered glycolysis and TCA-associated anaplerosis pathways were partially recovered. Although no significant difference was observed in the response of PDXG1 and PDXG3 to chemotherapy, the difference in glycolysis and amino acids metabolism between PDXG1 and PDXG3 could still be maintained. In addition, the metabolomic difference between PC and CDX models were much larger than that of PDX model and PC, indicating that PDX model still retain more metabolic characteristics of primary tumor which is more suitable for tumor-associated metabolism research.
Compared with primary tumor, PDX models have obvious difference in metabolomic level. These findings can help us design in vivo tumor metabolomics research legitimately and analyze the underlying mechanism of tumor metabolic biology thoughtfully.
患者来源的异种移植(PDX)模型已广泛用于肿瘤的生物学和病理学研究。然而,PDX 肿瘤与原发肿瘤(PC)的代谢相似性尚不清楚。
本研究通过移植胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的原发肿瘤,建立 PDX 模型,然后采用 H NMR 光谱法比较 PC、第一代 PDX 肿瘤(PDXG1)和第三代 PDX 肿瘤(PDXG3)的肿瘤代谢组学。然后,我们评估了 PDXG1 和 PDXG3 对化疗的反应差异以及耐药肿瘤组织中的代谢组学差异。为了评估 PDX 与 PC 的代谢组学相似性,我们还比较了细胞来源的异种移植(CDX)与 PC 和 PDX 与 PC 的代谢组学差异。
移植后,PDXG1 肿瘤与 PC 相比,乳酸盐、丙酮酸、柠檬酸和多种氨基酸(AA)水平较低。代谢物集富集和代谢途径分析表明,PDXG1 肿瘤中的糖酵解代谢受到抑制,三羧酸循环(TCA)相关的氨酰化途径,如氨基酸代谢,得到增强。然后,经过多次 PDX 传代,改变的糖酵解和 TCA 相关氨酰化途径部分恢复。虽然 PDXG1 和 PDXG3 对化疗的反应没有显著差异,但 PDXG1 和 PDXG3 之间的糖酵解和氨基酸代谢差异仍能维持。此外,PC 和 CDX 模型之间的代谢组学差异远大于 PDX 模型和 PC 之间的差异,这表明 PDX 模型仍然保留了更多的原发肿瘤代谢特征,更适合肿瘤相关代谢研究。
与原发肿瘤相比,PDX 模型在代谢组学水平上存在明显差异。这些发现有助于我们合理地设计体内肿瘤代谢组学研究,并深入分析肿瘤代谢生物学的潜在机制。