Suppr超能文献

中风后高久坐行为和低久坐行为相关因素的异同:一项混合方法研究

Similarities and differences in factors associated with high and low sedentary behavior after stroke: a mixed methods study.

作者信息

Kringle Emily A, Kersey Jessica, Lewis Megan A, Gibbs Bethany Barone, Skidmore Elizabeth R

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of MN, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, WA University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jan;47(2):469-477. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2341867. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify similarities and differences in factors affecting activity engagement between adults with stroke who are more and less sedentary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from two studies of adults with stroke ( = 36). Sedentary time was measured activPAL micro3. Participants completed activPAL interviews, which were analyzed using framework analysis. Participants were stratified into more and less sedentary groups based on activPAL data. Between-group similarities and differences were identified.

RESULTS

Adults with stroke (mean [SD] age = 65.8 [13.6] years, stroke chronicity = 40.5 [SD = 38.3] months, 36.1% female) were more sedentary (785.5 [64.7] sedentary minutes/day) and less sedentary (583.6 [87.4] sedentary minutes/day). Those who were more sedentary: engaged in basic activities of daily living, avoided activities, received assistance other people, and did not use strategies to overcome barriers. Those who were less sedentary: engaged in instrumental and community activities, embraced new strategies, did activities other people, and used strategies to overcome environmental barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors affecting activity engagement differed between people who are more and less sedentary. Interventions that aim to reduce post-stroke sedentary behavior should consider the: (1) types of activities, (2) role of other people, and (2) application of strategies to overcome activity and environment-related barriers.

摘要

目的

确定久坐程度较高和较低的中风成年患者在影响活动参与度的因素方面的异同。

材料与方法

数据来自两项针对中风成年患者的研究(n = 36)。使用activPAL micro3测量久坐时间。参与者完成了activPAL访谈,并采用框架分析法进行分析。根据activPAL数据将参与者分为久坐程度较高和较低的组。确定组间的异同。

结果

中风成年患者(平均[标准差]年龄 = 65.8 [13.6]岁,中风病程 = 40.5 [标准差 = 38.3]个月,女性占36.1%)久坐时间较长(785.5 [64.7]分钟/天)和久坐时间较短(583.6 [87.4]分钟/天)。久坐时间较长的患者:进行日常生活基本活动、避免活动、接受他人协助且未使用克服障碍的策略。久坐时间较短的患者:参与工具性和社区活动、采用新策略、与他人一起活动并使用策略克服环境障碍。

结论

久坐程度较高和较低的人群在影响活动参与度的因素方面存在差异。旨在减少中风后久坐行为的干预措施应考虑:(1)活动类型,(2)他人的作用,以及(2)应用克服与活动和环境相关障碍的策略。

相似文献

9
Sedentary behavior patterns over 6 weeks among ambulatory people with stroke.脑卒中患者 6 周内的久坐行为模式。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Oct;28(7):537-544. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1846934. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

8
Sedentary behavior patterns over 6 weeks among ambulatory people with stroke.脑卒中患者 6 周内的久坐行为模式。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Oct;28(7):537-544. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1846934. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验