Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Alva-yhtiöt Ltd, PO Box 4, 40101 Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Radiol Prot. 2024 Apr 18;44(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad3ce3.
The high radon concentrations measured in the indoor air of groundwater facilities and the prevalence of the problem have been known for several years. Unlike in other workplaces, in groundwater plants, radon is released into the air from the water treatment processes. During the measurements of this study, the average radon concentrations varied from 500 to 8800 Bq m. In addition, the indoor air of the treatment plants is filtered and there are no significant internal aerosol sources. However, only a few published studies on groundwater plants have investigated the properties of the radon progeny aerosol, such as the equilibrium factor () or the size distribution of the aerosol, which are important for assessing the dose received by workers. Moreover, the International Commission on Radiological Protection has not provided generic aerosol parameter values for dose assessment in groundwater treatment facilities. In this study, radon and radon progeny measurements were carried out at three groundwater plants. The results indicate surprisingly high unattached fractions (= 0.27-0.58), suggesting a low aerosol concentration in indoor air. The correspondingvalues were 0.09-0.42, well below those measured in previous studies. Based on a comparison of the effective dose rate calculations, either the determination of theor, with certain limitations, the measurement of radon is recommended. Dose rate calculation based on the potential alpha energy concentration alone proved unreliable.
多年来,人们已经知道地下水设施室内空气中的高氡浓度以及该问题的普遍性。与其他工作场所不同,在地下水厂中,氡从水处理过程中释放到空气中。在本研究的测量过程中,氡浓度平均值从 500 到 8800 Bq m 不等。此外,处理厂的室内空气经过过滤,没有明显的内部气溶胶源。然而,只有少数关于地下水厂的已发表研究调查了氡子体气溶胶的特性,例如平衡因子()或气溶胶的粒径分布,这些对于评估工人所接受的剂量很重要。此外,国际辐射防护委员会尚未为地下水处理设施中的剂量评估提供通用气溶胶参数值。在这项研究中,在三个地下水厂进行了氡和氡子体测量。结果表明,未结合分数(= 0.27-0.58)非常高,这表明室内空气中的气溶胶浓度较低。相应的值为 0.09-0.42,远低于之前研究中的测量值。基于有效剂量率计算的比较,建议要么确定理论值,要么在某些限制下进行氡测量。仅基于潜在的α能量浓度进行剂量率计算被证明是不可靠的。