Domínguez Jesús, Prociuk Denys, Marović Branko, Čyras Kristijonas, Cocarascu Oana, Ruiz Francis, Mi Ella, Mi Emma, Ramtale Christian, Rago Antonio, Darzi Ara, Toni Francesca, Curcin Vasa, Delaney Brendan
Department of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.
Imperial College London London UK.
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Sep 12;8(2):e10391. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10391. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans.
We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists.
Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise.
An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.
整合临床指南的临床决策支持(CDS)系统(CDSSs)需要反映现实世界中的合并症情况。在特定患者的临床背景下,需要有透明的建议,能够考虑到合并症引起的禁忌症和其他冲突。在这项工作中,我们开发并评估了一种基于标准的非专有方法,用于部署具有可解释论证的可计算指南,并将其与塞尔维亚(西巴尔干地区的一个中等收入国家)的一个商业电子健康记录(EHR)系统集成。
我们使用了一个本体框架,即基于转换的医学推荐(TMR)模型,来表示和推理指南概念,并分别选择2017年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(GOLD)国际全球倡议指南和一家塞尔维亚医院作为部署和评估地点。为了缓解潜在的指南冲突,我们使用了基于TMR的基于假设的论证框架(ABA+G)的实现,该框架扩展了偏好和目标。可计算指南的远程EHR集成是通过基于HL7 FHIR和CDS Hooks的微服务架构实现的。开发了一个原型集成,用于管理合并心血管或慢性肾脏疾病的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),并对20个模拟病例和5名肺病专家进行了混合方法评估。
肺病专家在97%的时间里同意CDSS为每个患者分配的基于GOLD的COPD症状严重程度评估,在98%的时间里同意所提出的COPD护理计划之一。对可解释论证的原则给予了好评;建议未来纳入更多合并症,并根据专业知识定制解释水平。
本体模型为长期疾病提供了一种灵活的方式来提供论证和可解释的人工智能。需要扩展到其他指南和多种合并症,以进一步测试该方法。