He Shasha, Wang Jianhui, Zhang Xianhong, Xie Jia, Wan Qingxuan, He Ruiyun, Chen Yanhan, Liu Xuexiu
Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
College of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 17;16(3):e56335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56335. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Background This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) and in vitro measurement (IVM) methods in localizing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in premature infants and analyze the relevant factors affecting the accuracy of IVM. Methodology The study employs a prospective before-and-after self-controlled clinical trial design. A total of 210 premature infants who underwent PICC catheterization were compared. We assessed the rate of catheter tip placement, consistency, and stability and analyzed the relevant factors. Results The study enrolled a total of 202 premature infants after eight infants dropped out. The one-time positioning rates of the PICC catheter tip using US and IVM were 100% and 73.8%, respectively. Concerning IVM, 53 (26.2%) patients did not reach the optimal position, with 24 (11.8%) patients having a shallow position and 29 (14.3%) having a deep position. The consistency of the two methods was 0.782 (p < 0.05). The degree of dispersion of US was 0.2 (0.0-0.4) cm, which was significantly smaller than IVM at 1.5 (0.0-1.8) cm. Gestational age less than 32 weeks (odds ratio (OR) = 6.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-30.81), weight less than 1,500 g (OR = 5.85, 95% CI = 2.11-16.20), body length less than 40 cm (OR = 15.36, 95% CI = 4.47-52.72), mechanical ventilation (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.77-14.83), abdominal distension (OR = 78.18, 95% CI = 10.62-575.22), and bloating (OR = 8.81, 95% CI = 1.42-47.00) were risk factors that affected the accuracy of IVM. Conclusions Gestational age, weight, length, mechanical ventilation, abdominal distension, and swelling can lead to deviations with IVM. US can directly view the tip of the catheter, which is more accurate. Additionally, it is recommended to reduce the length of the catheter by 1.3 cm when using IVM to achieve the best-estimated placement length.
背景 本研究旨在探讨超声检查(US)和体外测量(IVM)方法在定位早产儿经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)中的有效性,并分析影响IVM准确性的相关因素。 方法 本研究采用前瞻性自身对照临床试验设计。共比较了210例接受PICC置管的早产儿。我们评估了导管尖端放置的成功率、一致性和稳定性,并分析了相关因素。 结果 8例婴儿退出研究后,本研究共纳入202例早产儿。使用US和IVM时,PICC导管尖端的一次性定位成功率分别为100%和73.8%。关于IVM,53例(26.2%)患者未达到最佳位置,其中24例(11.8%)位置过浅,29例(14.3%)位置过深。两种方法的一致性为0.782(p<0.05)。US的离散度为0.2(0.0 - 0.4)cm,明显小于IVM的1.5(0.0 - 1.8)cm。胎龄小于32周(比值比(OR)=6.64,95%置信区间(CI)=1.43 - 30.81)、体重小于1500 g(OR =5.85,95%CI =2.11 - 16.20)、身长小于40 cm(OR =15.36,95%CI =4.47 - 52.72)、机械通气(OR =5.13,95%CI =1.77 - 14.83)、腹胀(OR =78.18,95%CI =10.62 - 575.22)和气胀(OR =8.81,95%CI =1.42 - 47.00)是影响IVM准确性的危险因素。 结论 胎龄、体重、身长、机械通气、腹胀和气胀可导致IVM出现偏差。US可直接观察导管尖端,更准确。此外,建议在使用IVM时将导管长度减少1.3 cm以获得最佳估计放置长度。