• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立有意义的食品营养分类:LoCard 食品分类法。

Building nutritionally meaningful classification for grocery product groups: the LoCard Food Classification process.

机构信息

Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, PO Box 66, 00014Helsinki, Finland.

Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Kanslerinrinne 1, 33100Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 28;132(6):770-781. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000710. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1017/S0007114524000710
PMID:38634262
Abstract

Analysing customer loyalty card data is a novel method for assessing nutritional quality and changes in a population's food consumption. However, prior to its use, the thousands of grocery products available in stores must be reclassified from the retailer's original hierarchical structure into a structure that is suitable for the use of nutrition and health research. We created LoCard Food Classification (LCFC) and examined how it reflects the nutritional quality of the grocery product groups. Nutritional quality was considered the main criterion guiding the reclassification of the 3574 grocery product groups. Information on the main ingredient of the product group, purpose of use and carbon footprint was also used at the more granular levels of LCFC. The main challenge in the reclassification was a lack of detailed information on the type of products included in each group, and some of the groups included products that have opposite health effects. The final LCFC has four hierarchical levels, and it is openly available online. After reclassification, the product groups were linked with the Finnish food composition database, and the nutrient profile was assessed by calculating the Nutrient-Rich Food Index (NRFI) for each product group. sd in NRFI decreased from 0·21 of the least granular level to 0·08 of the most granular level of LCFC indicating that the most granular level of LCFC has more homogeneous nutritional quality. Studies that apply LCFC to examine loyalty card data with health and environmental outcomes are needed to further demonstrate its validity.

摘要

分析客户忠诚度卡数据是评估人群食物消费的营养质量和变化的一种新方法。然而,在使用之前,必须将商店中数千种杂货产品从零售商的原始层次结构重新分类为适合营养和健康研究使用的结构。我们创建了 LoCard Food Classification(LCFC),并研究了它如何反映杂货产品组的营养质量。营养质量被认为是指导 3574 个杂货产品组重新分类的主要标准。在 LCFC 的更细粒度级别上,还使用了关于产品组主要成分、用途和碳足迹的信息。重新分类的主要挑战是缺乏每个组中包含的产品类型的详细信息,并且一些组中包含的产品具有相反的健康影响。最终的 LCFC 有四个层次结构,并且可以在线公开获得。重新分类后,将产品组与芬兰食物成分数据库链接,并通过计算每个产品组的营养丰富食物指数(NRFI)来评估营养状况。NRFI 中的 sd 从 LCFC 最细粒度级别的 0·21 降低到最粗粒度级别的 0·08,表明 LCFC 的最粗粒度级别的营养质量更加均匀。需要应用 LCFC 来研究与健康和环境结果相关的忠诚度卡数据的研究,以进一步证明其有效性。

相似文献

1
Building nutritionally meaningful classification for grocery product groups: the LoCard Food Classification process.建立有意义的食品营养分类:LoCard 食品分类法。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 28;132(6):770-781. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000710. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
The dynamics in food selection stemming from price awareness and perceived income adequacy: a cross-sectional study using 1-year loyalty card data.源于价格意识和感知收入充足性的食物选择动态:一项使用1年忠诚度卡数据的横断面研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 May;119(5):1346-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3
Tensorial Principal Component Analysis in Detecting Temporal Trajectories of Purchase Patterns in Loyalty Card Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.张量主成分分析在 loyalty card 数据中检测购买模式时间轨迹:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e44599. doi: 10.2196/44599.
4
Characterization and Correction of Bias Due to Nonparticipation and the Degree of Loyalty in Large-Scale Finnish Loyalty Card Data on Grocery Purchases: Cohort Study.芬兰大规模购物忠诚卡数据中因未参与及忠诚度导致的偏差特征与校正:队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 15;22(7):e18059. doi: 10.2196/18059.
5
The Availability and Quality of Food Labelling Components in the Canadian E-Grocery Retail Environment.加拿大电子杂货零售环境中食品标签成分的供应和质量。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 29;13(8):2611. doi: 10.3390/nu13082611.
6
Food Marketing Practices of Major Online Grocery Retailers in the United States, 2019-2020.美国主要在线杂货零售商的食品营销实践,2019-2020 年。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;122(12):2295-2310.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Do we eat what we buy? Relative validity of grocery purchase data as an indicator of food consumption in the LoCard study.我们是否购买了我们所吃的食物?在 LoCard 研究中,杂货购买数据作为食物消费指标的相对有效性。
Br J Nutr. 2022 Nov 14;128(9):1780-1788. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521004177. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
The Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 Performs Similarly to the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in a National Survey of Household Food Purchases.2016 年杂货购买质量指数在全国家庭食品购买调查中与 2015 年健康饮食指数表现相当。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.08.165. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Estimating Dietary Intake from Grocery Shopping Data-A Comparative Validation of Relevant Indicators in Switzerland.从杂货店购物数据估计膳食摄入量——瑞士相关指标的比较验证。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 29;14(1):159. doi: 10.3390/nu14010159.
10
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamics in food selection stemming from price awareness and perceived income adequacy: a cross-sectional study using 1-year loyalty card data.源于价格意识和感知收入充足性的食物选择动态:一项使用1年忠诚度卡数据的横断面研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 May;119(5):1346-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 7.