Department Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, University of Padova, Legnaro (PD) 35020, Italy.
Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito sn de Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Ann Bot. 2024 Jun 7;134(1):19-42. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae054.
The mechanisms leading to dieback and death of trees under drought remain unclear. To gain an understanding of these mechanisms, addressing major empirical gaps regarding tree structure-function relations remains essential.
We give reasons to think that a central factor shaping plant form and function is selection simultaneously favouring constant leaf-specific conductance with height growth and isometric (1:1) scaling between leaf area and the volume of metabolically active sink tissues ('sapwood'). Sapwood volume-leaf area isometry implies that per-leaf area sapwood volumes become transversely narrower with height growth; we call this 'stretching'. Stretching means that selection must favour increases in permeability above and beyond that afforded by tip-to-base conduit widening ("ultra-widening permeability"), via fewer and wider vessels or tracheids with larger pits or larger margo openings. Leaf area-metabolically active sink tissue isometry would mean that it is unlikely that larger trees die during drought because of carbon starvation due to greater sink-source relationships as compared to shorter plants. Instead, an increase in permeability is most plausibly associated with greater risk of embolism, and this seems a more probable explanation of the preferential vulnerability of larger trees to climate change-induced drought. Other implications of selection favouring constant per-leaf area sapwood construction and maintenance costs are departure from the da Vinci rule expectation of similar sapwood areas across branching orders, and that extensive conduit furcation in the stem seems unlikely.
Because all these considerations impact the likelihood of vulnerability to hydraulic failure versus carbon starvation, both implicated as key suspects in forest mortality, we suggest that these predictions represent essential priorities for empirical testing.
导致树木干枯和死亡的机制仍不清楚。为了了解这些机制,解决关于树木结构-功能关系的主要经验差距仍然至关重要。
我们有理由认为,一个塑造植物形态和功能的核心因素是同时有利于随着高度生长而保持恒定的叶片比导度,以及叶片面积与代谢活跃的吸收组织(“边材”)体积之间的等比(1:1)缩放。边材体积-叶片面积等比意味着,随着高度的增加,每叶片面积的边材体积在横向上变得越来越窄;我们称之为“拉伸”。拉伸意味着,选择必须有利于在尖端到基部导管变宽(“超宽导度”)提供的通透性增加之上,通过更少、更宽的导管或管胞,具有更大的纹孔或更大的边缘开口。叶片面积-代谢活跃的吸收组织等比意味着,较大的树木不太可能因为碳饥饿而在干旱中死亡,因为与较短的植物相比,较大的树木具有更大的源-汇关系。相反,通透性的增加最有可能与栓塞的更大风险相关联,这似乎是较大树木对气候变化引起的干旱更易受影响的更可能的解释。选择有利于恒定的每叶片面积边材构建和维护成本的其他影响是偏离达芬奇规则的预期,即在分枝阶数上具有相似的边材面积,并且茎中的广泛导管分叉似乎不太可能。
因为所有这些考虑都影响到对水力失效与碳饥饿的脆弱性的可能性,这两者都被认为是森林死亡率的关键嫌疑人,所以我们建议这些预测代表了进行实证检验的重要优先事项。