Sánchez-Juan Pascual, Valeriano-Lorenzo Elizabeth, Ruiz-González Alicia, Pastor Ana Belén, Rodrigo Lara Hector, López-González Francisco, Zea-Sevilla María Ascensión, Valentí Meritxell, Frades Belen, Ruiz Paloma, Saiz Laura, Burgueño-García Iván, Calero Miguel, Del Ser Teodoro, Rábano Alberto
Alzheimer's Centre Reina Sofia-CIEN Foundation-ISCIII, Research Platforms, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Brain. 2024 May 3;147(5):1667-1679. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae035.
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a proxy of astrocyte reactivity, has been proposed as biomarker of Alzheimer's disease. However, there is limited information about the correlation between blood biomarkers and post-mortem neuropathology. In a single-centre prospective clinicopathological cohort of 139 dementia patients, for which the time-frame between GFAP level determination and neuropathological assessment was exceptionally short (on average 139 days), we analysed this biomarker, measured at three time points, in relation to proxies of disease progression such as cognitive decline and brain weight. Most importantly, we investigated the use of blood GFAP to detect the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease, while accounting for potential influences of the most frequent brain co-pathologies. The main findings demonstrated an association between serum GFAP level and post-mortem tau pathology (β = 12.85; P < 0.001) that was independent of amyloid deposits (β = 13.23; P = 0.02). A mediation analysis provided additional support for the role of astrocytic activation as a link between amyloid and tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between pre-mortem serum GFAP and brain weight at post-mortem (r = -0.35; P < 0.001). This finding, together with evidence of a negative correlation with cognitive assessments (r = -0.27; P = 0.005), supports the role of GFAP as a biomarker for disease monitoring, even in the late phases of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of GFAP in advanced dementia patients was explored, and its discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve at baseline = 0.91) in differentiating neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease dementias from non-Alzheimer's disease dementias was determined, despite the challenging scenario of advanced age and frequent co-pathologies in these patients. Independently of Alzheimer's disease, serum GFAP levels were shown to be associated with two other pathologies targeting the temporal lobes-hippocampal sclerosis (β = 3.64; P = 0.03) and argyrophilic grain disease (β = -6.11; P = 0.02). Finally, serum GFAP levels were revealed to be correlated with astrocyte reactivity, using the brain GFAP-immunostained area as a proxy (ρ = 0.21; P = 0.02). Our results contribute to increasing evidence suggesting a role for blood GFAP as an Alzheimer's disease biomarker, and the findings offer mechanistic insights into the relationship between blood GFAP and Alzheimer's disease neuropathology, highlighting its ties with tau burden. Moreover, the data highlighting an independent association between serum GFAP levels and other neuropathological lesions provide information for clinicians to consider when interpreting test results. The longitudinal design and correlation with post-mortem data reinforce the robustness of our findings. However, studies correlating blood biomarkers and neuropathological assessments are still scant, and further research is needed to replicate and validate these results in diverse populations.
胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是星形胶质细胞反应性的一个指标,已被提议作为阿尔茨海默病的生物标志物。然而,关于血液生物标志物与死后神经病理学之间的相关性信息有限。在一个由139名痴呆患者组成的单中心前瞻性临床病理队列中,GFAP水平测定与神经病理学评估之间的时间间隔非常短(平均139天),我们分析了在三个时间点测量的这种生物标志物与疾病进展指标(如认知衰退和脑重量)之间的关系。最重要的是,我们研究了血液GFAP在检测阿尔茨海默病神经病理学特征方面的应用,同时考虑了最常见的脑部合并症的潜在影响。主要研究结果表明,血清GFAP水平与死后tau病理学之间存在关联(β = 12.85;P < 0.001),且独立于淀粉样蛋白沉积(β = 13.23;P = 0.02)。中介分析为星形胶质细胞激活在阿尔茨海默病淀粉样蛋白和tau病理学之间的联系中所起的作用提供了额外支持。此外,生前血清GFAP与死后脑重量之间存在负相关(r = -0.35;P < 0.001)。这一发现以及与认知评估负相关的证据(r = -0.27;P = 0.005),支持了GFAP作为疾病监测生物标志物的作用,即使在阿尔茨海默病晚期也是如此。此外,我们探讨了GFAP在晚期痴呆患者中的诊断性能,并确定了其在区分神经病理学确诊的阿尔茨海默病痴呆与非阿尔茨海默病痴呆方面的鉴别能力(基线时受试者操作特征曲线下面积 = 0.91),尽管这些患者存在高龄和频繁合并症的挑战性情况。独立于阿尔茨海默病,血清GFAP水平还与另外两种累及颞叶的病理学病变相关——海马硬化(β = 3.64;P = 0.03)和嗜银颗粒病(β = -6.11;P = 0.02)。最后,以脑GFAP免疫染色面积为指标,发现血清GFAP水平与星形胶质细胞反应性相关(ρ = 0.21;P = 0.02)。我们的研究结果有助于增加证据表明血液GFAP作为阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的作用,这些发现为血液GFAP与阿尔茨海默病神经病理学之间的关系提供了机制性见解,突出了其与tau负担的联系。此外,强调血清GFAP水平与其他神经病理学病变之间独立关联的数据为临床医生在解释检测结果时提供了参考信息。纵向设计以及与死后数据的相关性增强了我们研究结果的稳健性。然而,将血液生物标志物与神经病理学评估相关联的研究仍然很少,需要进一步研究在不同人群中复制和验证这些结果。