Suppr超能文献

第一跖趾关节融合术后患者使用不同矫形器的足底压力分析

Plantar pressure analysis of different orthoses in patients after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.

作者信息

Golden Dana, Corbett R O, Cooper Minton Truitt, Hertel Jay

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

University of Virginia Orthopedic Surgery, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Oct 1;48(5):540-545. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000352. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no gold standard for a walking orthosis after first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis surgery. Evaluation of plantar pressure measures and patient perceptions for different orthoses may assist surgeons to choose a postsurgery orthotic. The purpose of this study was to measure plantar pressure under the distal first ray during walking and patient perceptions of comfort, stability, and preference with 4 different orthoses in patients with a history of first MTPJ arthrodesis.

METHODS

Crossover study in a university laboratory. Eleven patients volunteered (8 female, 3 male, age = 59.4 ± 9.1 years, 21.9 ± 17.5 months since surgery) who had a unilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis procedure more than 6 months before study participation. Four orthosis conditions were evaluated in all participants: patient's shoe, carbon fiber insert, OrthoWedge, and Post-Op Shoe. We analyzed peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral under the whole foot and the distal first ray as well as recorded subjective rating for comfort and stability. Rank ordered for preferred orthosis.

RESULTS

OrthoWedge had significantly lower whole-foot and distal first ray peak pressure than the other conditions. The pressure-time integral for the OrthoWedge was significantly less than the Carbon Fiber Insert and Post-Op Shoe. For stability, comfort, and condition preference, the OrthoWedge was ranked lowest among the 4 conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The OrthoWedge generated the lowest peak plantar pressure but was subjectively ranked as the least preferred orthosis. This discrepancy between objective biomechanical and subjective comfort measures must be weighed as surgeons prescribe an orthosis to patients after first MTPJ arthrodesis.

摘要

背景

对于第一跖趾关节(MTPJ)融合术后的步行矫形器,尚无金标准。评估不同矫形器的足底压力测量值和患者感受,可能有助于外科医生选择术后矫形器。本研究的目的是测量有第一跖趾关节融合术病史的患者在行走时第一跖骨远端下方的足底压力,以及患者对4种不同矫形器的舒适度、稳定性和偏好感受。

方法

在大学实验室进行的交叉研究。11名患者自愿参与(8名女性,3名男性,年龄=59.4±9.1岁,术后21.9±17.5个月),他们在参与研究前6个多月接受了单侧第一跖趾关节融合手术。对所有参与者评估4种矫形器情况:患者的鞋子、碳纤维鞋垫、OrthoWedge和术后鞋。我们分析了全足和第一跖骨远端下方的足底峰值压力和压力-时间积分,并记录了舒适度和稳定性的主观评分。对首选矫形器进行排序。

结果

OrthoWedge的全足和第一跖骨远端峰值压力明显低于其他情况。OrthoWedge的压力-时间积分明显小于碳纤维鞋垫和术后鞋。在稳定性、舒适度和对矫形器情况的偏好方面,OrthoWedge在4种情况中排名最低。

结论

OrthoWedge产生的足底峰值压力最低,但在主观上被列为最不首选的矫形器。在为第一跖趾关节融合术后的患者开处方时,外科医生必须权衡客观生物力学指标和主观舒适度指标之间的这种差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验